Hi
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:17 AM Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:30 PM Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > From: Marc-André Lureau
> > > >
> > > > Do not send a release event between two grabs, this helps with window
> > > > manager interaction
>
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:30 PM Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > From: Marc-André Lureau
> > >
> > > Do not send a release event between two grabs, this helps with window
> > > manager interaction issues on peer side.
> > >
> >
> > I would explain which kind of issue this is
Hi
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:30 PM Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>
> >
> > From: Marc-André Lureau
> >
> > Do not send a release event between two grabs, this helps with window
> > manager interaction issues on peer side.
> >
>
> I would explain which kind of issue this is supposed to fix.
They react
>
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> Do not send a release event between two grabs, this helps with window
> manager interaction issues on peer side.
>
I would explain which kind of issue this is supposed to fix.
> Advertise this behaviour via a capability introduced in spice-protocol
> 0.12.16,
From: Marc-André Lureau
Do not send a release event between two grabs, this helps with window
manager interaction issues on peer side.
Advertise this behaviour via a capability introduced in spice-protocol
0.12.16, so the client doesn't need to do some time-based filtering.
(the capability
