On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 03:48:06AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > +static inline void
> > > +g_test_assert_expected_messages_internal_no_warnings(const char *domain,
> > > + const char *file,
> > > int
> > > line, const char *func)
> > > +{
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:15:47AM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > In case GLib don't provide these functions we use replacements so
> > there's no need to have a warning if these functions are called.
> > This potentially capture other compatibility issues in the tests
> > that would be
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:15:47AM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> In case GLib don't provide these functions we use replacements so
> there's no need to have a warning if these functions are called.
> This potentially capture other compatibility issues in the tests
> that would be ignored having
In case GLib don't provide these functions we use replacements so
there's no need to have a warning if these functions are called.
This potentially capture other compatibility issues in the tests
that would be ignored having all deprecation warnings disabled.
Tested with GLib 2.28 and 2.52.
