ping
I'd like to have at least this in (without 2/2) to help declare some new
object.
>
> The macros will implement most of the boilerplate needed
> to declare an object.
> Their usage are similar to GLib G_DECLARE_*_TYPE macros.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
> ---
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:58:21AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:42:29PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > > The macros will implement most of the boilerplate needed
> > > > > to declare an object.
> > > > > Their usage are similar to
>
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:58:21AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:42:29PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > The macros will implement most of the boilerplate needed
> > > > to declare an object.
> > > > Their usage are similar to GLib
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:58:21AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:42:29PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > The macros will implement most of the boilerplate needed
> > > to declare an object.
> > > Their usage are similar to GLib G_DECLARE_*_TYPE macros.
> >
>
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:42:29PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > The macros will implement most of the boilerplate needed
> > to declare an object.
> > Their usage are similar to GLib G_DECLARE_*_TYPE macros.
>
> Can we/should we use the GLib provided macros when they are available,
>
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:42:29PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> The macros will implement most of the boilerplate needed
> to declare an object.
> Their usage are similar to GLib G_DECLARE_*_TYPE macros.
Can we/should we use the GLib provided macros when they are available,
and copy/paste the
The macros will implement most of the boilerplate needed
to declare an object.
Their usage are similar to GLib G_DECLARE_*_TYPE macros.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio
---
Changes since v1:
- use SPICE_ prefix instead of GOBJECT_;
- if RED_ prefix is used use this prefix for