>
> We don't want to maintain more macros than necessary and in the end
> the equivalent G_GNUC_XXX macros should be preferred.
spice-protocol public header are plain C so suggesting to use Glib is
not correct.
> Should any project actually depend on these macros they can keep using
> them by
We don't want to maintain more macros than necessary and in the end
the equivalent G_GNUC_XXX macros should be preferred.
Should any project actually depend on these macros they can keep using
them by defining the usual SPICE_DEPRECATED macro until they migrate
away from them or the macros are
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:50:02AM +0100, Francois Gouget wrote:
> We don't want to maintain more macros than necessary and in the end
> the equivalent G_GNUC_XXX macros should be preferred.
> Should any project actually depend on these macros they can keep using
> them by defining the usual
We don't want to maintain more macros than necessary and in the end
the equivalent G_GNUC_XXX macros should be preferred.
Should any project actually depend on these macros they can keep using
them by defining the usual SPICE_DEPRECATED macro until they migrate
away from them or the macros are
