On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 04:41:02PM -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> >
> > In spice-gtk we use both style, I don't mind, but I have a slight
> > preference for the first.
> >
> > declarations are however almost always
> >
> > static void function_name(type name);
> >
> > in short, I like
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 14:11 -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:54:26PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I noted that in recent patches we started using this style:
> > >
> > > static void
>
Hi
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:54:26PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I noted that in recent patches we started using this style:
> >
> > static void
> > function_name(type name)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > instead of the "classic" (in our code)
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:54:26PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> Hi,
> I noted that in recent patches we started using this style:
>
> static void
> function_name(type name)
> {
> }
>
> instead of the "classic" (in our code)
>
> static void function_name(type name)
> {
> }
>
>
Hi,
I noted that in recent patches we started using this style:
static void
function_name(type name)
{
}
instead of the "classic" (in our code)
static void function_name(type name)
{
}
Personally I like the first and I don't complain (and other people
seems to not complain too) however
