Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/9] build: require c99

2011-04-27 Thread Christophe Fergeau
Why do you want to require c99? Do the compilers we use on windows have good enough c99 support? Christophe On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:17:21PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: --- configure.ac |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/9] build: require c99

2011-04-27 Thread Marc-André Lureau
- Original Message - Why do you want to require c99? Do the compilers we use on windows have good enough c99 support? Because we use c99: stdbool.h, inttypes.h, bool, variadic macros, // comments, ... Actually, I wonder if 43c5b4f97334f0f4ca61bdd679b68d079575deac is redundant if we

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/9] build: require c99

2011-04-27 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:22:34AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: - Original Message - Why do you want to require c99? Do the compilers we use on windows have good enough c99 support? Because we use c99: stdbool.h, inttypes.h, bool, variadic macros, // comments, ...