Hi,
On 01/30/2012 08:25 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hey
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok. So shall I move ahead with the new release, as in push my
commits (with the release one changed for 0.9) + a v0.9 tag,
put tarbals on the download page, etc. ?
You are welcome
- Mensaje original -
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:02:43PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Can we consider the added API stable?
> >
> > If yes, please use v0.9, since it's a normal update, no API break,
> > we
> > guarantee API stability, it's a normal minor version update.
>
> As a
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 07:02:43PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Can we consider the added API stable?
>
> If yes, please use v0.9, since it's a normal update, no API break, we
> guarantee API stability, it's a normal minor version update.
As an aside, how is versioning working exactly? Will
Hey
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Ok. So shall I move ahead with the new release, as in push my
> commits (with the release one changed for 0.9) + a v0.9 tag,
> put tarbals on the download page, etc. ?
You are welcome to do so!
thanks
--
Marc-André Lureau
___
Hi,
Thanks for the reviews!
On 01/30/2012 07:02 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
+v0.8.1
+==
Can we consider the added API stable?
Yes.
If yes, please use v0.9, since it's a normal update, no API break, we
guarantee API stabilit
Hi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> +v0.8.1
> +==
Can we consider the added API stable?
If yes, please use v0.9, since it's a normal update, no API break, we
guarantee API stability, it's a normal minor version update.
If not, we should make a normal "snapshot release
