On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 11:24:00AM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 22:25 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 10:49 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 12:31 +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
> > > > John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 12:31 +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
> John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 09:44 +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
> >
> >> Hi John,
> >> See my comments below.
> >> Arnon
> >>
> >> John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello, all. I'm spinning this off of the
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 09:44 +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
Hi John,
See my comments below.
Arnon
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. I'm spinning this off of the "Unfair Comparisons with RDP"
thread as that one is getting a bit long. However, in it, Yaniv
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 09:44 +0300, Arnon Gilboa wrote:
> Hi John,
> See my comments below.
> Arnon
>
> John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> > Hello, all. I'm spinning this off of the "Unfair Comparisons with RDP"
> > thread as that one is getting a bit long. However, in it, Yaniv
> > identified that we
Hi John,
See my comments below.
Arnon
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
Hello, all. I'm spinning this off of the "Unfair Comparisons with RDP"
thread as that one is getting a bit long. However, in it, Yaniv
identified that we were not using vdagent in our Windows guest based
upon the packet traces w
