Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/9] build: require c99

2011-04-27 Thread Christophe Fergeau
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:22:34AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > - Original Message - > > Why do you want to require c99? Do the compilers we use on windows > > have > > good enough c99 support? > > Because we use c99: stdbool.h, inttypes.h, bool, variadic macros, // > comments, ..

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/9] build: require c99

2011-04-27 Thread Marc-André Lureau
- Original Message - > Why do you want to require c99? Do the compilers we use on windows > have > good enough c99 support? Because we use c99: stdbool.h, inttypes.h, bool, variadic macros, // comments, ... Actually, I wonder if 43c5b4f97334f0f4ca61bdd679b68d079575deac is redundant if

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/9] build: require c99

2011-04-27 Thread Christophe Fergeau
Why do you want to require c99? Do the compilers we use on windows have good enough c99 support? Christophe On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:17:21PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > --- > configure.ac |4 > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/con

[Spice-devel] [PATCH 2/9] build: require c99

2011-01-25 Thread Marc-André Lureau
--- configure.ac |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 02ec331..2af3647 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ SPICE_COMMON_SRCDIR='$(top_srcdir)'/common AS_IF([test "$CFLAGS" = ""], [], [_cflags_is