Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH qxl-win] display: apply the fix in fc314927bc48835e to Alpha Bitmaps

2013-07-07 Thread Alon Levy
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 11:25 -0400, Yonit Halperin wrote: rhbz#968050 Looks great to me, ACK. In contrast to Microsoft Msdn documentation, the iUniq of a SURFOBJ doesn't always change when the surface changes. However, it seems that the iUniq of the associated color_trans (XLATEOBJ)

Re: [Spice-devel] [PATCH qxl-win] display: apply the fix in fc314927bc48835e to Alpha Bitmaps

2013-07-07 Thread Uri Lublin
On 07/05/2013 06:25 PM, Yonit Halperin wrote: rhbz#968050 In contrast to Microsoft Msdn documentation, the iUniq of a SURFOBJ doesn't always change when the surface changes. However, it seems that the iUniq of the associated color_trans (XLATEOBJ) changes, while its flXlate=XO_TRIVIAL. Since we

[Spice-devel] [PATCH qxl-win] display: apply the fix in fc314927bc48835e to Alpha Bitmaps

2013-07-05 Thread Yonit Halperin
rhbz#968050 In contrast to Microsoft Msdn documentation, the iUniq of a SURFOBJ doesn't always change when the surface changes. However, it seems that the iUniq of the associated color_trans (XLATEOBJ) changes, while its flXlate=XO_TRIVIAL. Since we tried to retrieve the alpha bitmap key only by