Hi,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 02:27:57PM +0200, Jakub Janku wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:10 AM Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Avoid linearizing if the message isn't written out anyway
> >
> > "linearizing" ? What do you mean about that?
> > Looking at definitions it seems
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:10 AM Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Avoid linearizing if the message isn't written out anyway
> >
> > "linearizing" ? What do you mean about that?
> > Looking at definitions it seems not correct to me.
>
> I was simply referring to the
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:10 AM Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>
> >
> > Avoid linearizing if the message isn't written out anyway
>
> "linearizing" ? What do you mean about that?
> Looking at definitions it seems not correct to me.
I was simply referring to the spice_marshaller_linearize() call.
>
> Avoid linearizing if the message isn't written out anyway
"linearizing" ? What do you mean about that?
Looking at definitions it seems not correct to me.
> (spice_channel_flush_wire checks() this condition as well).
>
> This also silences the following error:
>
> (spicy:32087):
Avoid linearizing if the message isn't written out anyway
(spice_channel_flush_wire checks() this condition as well).
This also silences the following error:
(spicy:32087): GSpice-CRITICAL **: 16:22:03.147:
spice_session_get_read_only: assertion 'SPICE_IS_SESSION(self)' failed
that can be
