On 08/04/2017 03:52 PM, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
On 4 Aug 2017, at 14:49, Victor Toso wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 02:34:44PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
If I look at a patch I sent, then I have a button and also a “delegate to” pop
up.
One of the
> On 4 Aug 2017, at 14:49, Victor Toso wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 02:34:44PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>>
>>> On 4 Aug 2017, at 14:03, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>>>
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:01:05PM +0200,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 02:34:44PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>
> > On 4 Aug 2017, at 14:03, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:01:05PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> It does not check if given patch was
> On 4 Aug 2017, at 14:03, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:01:05PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
It does not check if given patch was pushed, no. :(
>>>
>>> If so, that’s a lot less useful than PRs.
>>
>> All comes down to
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:01:05PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> > > It does not check if given patch was pushed, no. :(
> >
> > If so, that’s a lot less useful than PRs.
>
> All comes down to workflow in the end... Some people love it :)
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/
>
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:01:05PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> > It does not check if given patch was pushed, no. :(
>
> If so, that’s a lot less useful than PRs.
All comes down to workflow in the end... Some people love it :)
https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/
signature.asc
> On 4 Aug 2017, at 12:48, Victor Toso wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:42:39PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
>> During the discussion on PRs and stuff, several people pointed to
>> patchwork.
>>
>> Does anyone know why this tool does not acknowledge
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:42:39PM +0200, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> During the discussion on PRs and stuff, several people pointed to
> patchwork.
>
> Does anyone know why this tool does not acknowledge acks? For example
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/27298/ has a "Acked-by:
During the discussion on PRs and stuff, several people pointed to patchwork.
Does anyone know why this tool does not acknowledge acks? For example
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/27298/ has a "Acked-by: Christophe de
Dinechin ” in the fifth comment, and has been