Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6

Chiming in on SR-MPLS and SRv6 feature parity discussion. SRv6 and SR-MPLS serve as future MPLS replacement options for operators. The architecture of both technologies are completely different as to how they operate. >From a timeline historical perspective we had atm and frame relay followed

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call

Hi, Support. Thanks, Francois Le 3 janv. 2020 à 03:01, Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) a écrit :  Happy New Year. I support. Thanks, Pablo. From: spring on behalf of "bruno.decra...@orange.com" Date: Thursday, 19 December 2019 at 17:54 To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring]

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call

Dear WG and Chairs, I support this early allocation Thanks Regards … Zafar From: spring on behalf of "bruno.decra...@orange.com" Date: Thursday, December 19, 2019 at 11:55 AM To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call Hi

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call

I support this early allocation. Thanks, Shunwan From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 12:54 AM To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call Hi SPRING

Re: [spring] IPR poll for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document. thanks, Arthi Ayyangar From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 8:50 AM To: 'SPRING WG List' ; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming Subject: IPR poll for

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call

Support. thanks, Jingrong From:bruno.decraene To:SPRING WG Date:2019-12-20 00:54:44 Subject:[spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call Hi SPRING WG, This begins a 2 week Early Allocation call for a “Ethernet” value from the "Protocol Numbers"

Re: [spring] WG adoption request for draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm {WAS: WG status - pending calls

Hi Rakesh, The request has been recorded in the wiki. https://trac.ietf.org/trac/spring/wiki/WikiStart Best regards, Shuping From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rakesh Gandhi Sent: Friday, January 3, 2020 3:58 AM To: bruno.decra...@orange.com Cc: SPRING WG List Subject:

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call

Hi Chairs, all, I support this early allocation. I agree that the criteria for the early allocation of this code point are met, and there are already multiple deployments worldwide. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status-04

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming: Relative advantages of SRv6

Hi Robert, Three responses: A) What prevents SR-MPLS from evolving along the same path as SRv6? B) The uSID proposal introduces its own set of deployment issues, which have been discussed in depth on this list as well as on 6man. C) Could you be a little more specific about the failure

Re: [spring] WG adoption request for draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm {WAS: WG status - pending calls

Hi Chairs, WG, The draft was presented at the last IETF meeting and there was a good support in the session for WG adoption. We like to formally request WG adoption for this draft: draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm Thanks, Rakesh On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:58 AM wrote: > Hi SPRING, > > > > A

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call

Happy New Year. I support. Thanks, Pablo. From: spring on behalf of "bruno.decra...@orange.com" Date: Thursday, 19 December 2019 at 17:54 To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early Allocation Call Hi SPRING WG, This begins a 2 week Early