Dear Authors, WG Chairs, et al.,
I hope I'm not too late with my comments and questions on the document.
Please kindly consider them as WG LC comments:
- I have a question regarding the following pseudo-code:
S08. max_LE = (Hdr Ext Len / 2) - 1
S09. If ((Last Entry > max_LE) or
Hello!
As a contributor, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR on this document.
Thanks,
Prem.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 8:50 AM wrote:
> Hi SPRING WG,
>
> In parallel to the WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming, we
> would like to poll for IPR.
>
> If you are aware of IPR that
Pablo,
RFC 8354 reinforces my analysis in
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/3WGuQumIfcmH281nwq3s9Un6raI. Are
you saying that you agree with this analysis?
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Sent:
Pablo,
Let me try to ask the question another way:
1. Is it generally acceptable for a SID to appear in the source address
field of an IPv6 header?
2. Can an exception be made for ICMP messages?
I think that the answer to the first question is "no", because doing so would
break ICMP.
Pablo,
Got it. I assume the next version of the draft will reflect this point.
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 4:15 AM
To: Ron Bonica
Cc: weibin.w...@nokia-sbell.com;
As a contributer I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this
draft.
Ahmed
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 3:15 AM Arthi Ayyangar wrote:
> I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.
>
> thanks,
> Arthi Ayyangar
>
> --
> *From:*
Ron,
It’s good to see agreement on the fact that SRH follows RFC4443 Section 2.2
with respect to how the ICMP Source Address is selected.
Can you please point me to the text in
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming that changes the behavior below from
RFC4443 Section 2.2? I believe there
Ron,
SPRING has already done this work and documented the SRv6 use-cases in RFC8354
before progressing with the SRv6 standardization.
Further on, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming is a Standards Track
document.
I fail to see how a cite from RFC8354 or any other text on “SRv6 vs
Hi Adrian,
Happy New Year.
Please see inline.
Many thanks for your comments,
Pablo.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel
Organisation: Old Dog Consulting
Reply to: "adr...@olddog.co.uk"
Date: Friday, 27 December 2019 at 20:29
To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)"
Cc: "spring@ietf.org"
Ron,
Happy New Year.
You may have forgotten the conversation that we had in December where I replied
to this same question.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/d45B3wI5UBliIE0aoJPU-PDNe7w
Please re-read that thread and let me know if it is still unclear.
Thanks,
Pablo.
From: Ron
10 matches
Mail list logo
