IMHO there is still a logical defect in the description of the PSP flavor at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-17#section-4.16.1
The description of the PSP flavor considers the packet to have
(Segments Left == 0 and Destination Address == the PSP node's
Hi WG, Authors,
I support adoption.
Looking forward to changes as per the discussion in the other thread
started by Joel. I found a few things that can increase the
readability of the document.
Minor
- The document doesn't use normative keywords of RFC 2119 (RFC 2119 is
in reference somehow
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Has Issues
This document together with the companion document
[I-D.filsfils-spring-srv6-net-pgm-illustration] defines the SRv6 Network
Programming concept and specifies the main segment routing behaviors to enable
the creation of interoperable overlays with
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Has Issues
This document together with the companion document
[I-D.filsfils-spring-srv6-net-pgm-illustration] defines the SRv6 Network
Programming concept and specifies the main segment routing behaviors to enable
the creation of interoperable overlays with
