Yes, support.
Best regards,
Mach
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 8:34 PM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for
Hi Yuanxiang,
Please see in-line.
Cheers,
Tianran
-Original Message-
From: Qiuyuanxiang [mailto:qiuyuanxi...@h3c.com]
Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 4:17 PM
To: Wangyali(Yali,Data Communication Standards and Patents Dept)
; spring@ietf.org
Cc: Haoyu Song ; Tianran Zhou
Subject: 答复:
Dear chairs and the WG,
I have reviewed the draft and find it a needed companion of the work adopted by
the IPPM WG
I support the adoption
Thanks
Regards … Zafar
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Monday, June 7, 2021 at 8:34 AM
To: "spring@ietf.org"
Cc:
Support for WG adoption
Regards,
Luay
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Monday, June 7, 2021 at 7:34 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt
Dear WG:
The
Support adoption. Read the document, it is important area to work and make
progress .
From: James Guichard
Date: Monday, June 7, 2021 at 5:34 AM
To: "spring@ietf.org"
Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for
I support this document for WG adoption. It addresses an important issue.
Thanks.
Jorge
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Monday, June 7, 2021 at 2:34 PM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for
Hi Fan,
When possible, we should try to implement for mpls and SRv6 data plane
similarly.
In fact, not adding FI/SN at the replication node is more important for SRv6 –
it’d save you an extra IPv6 header.
Jeffrey
From: Yangfan (IP Standard)
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 1:01 PM
To: Jeffrey
Hi Fan,
Please see zzh1> below.
From: Yangfan (IP Standard)
Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 12:11 PM
To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; 'Rishabh Parekh'
Cc: 'Arvind Venkateswaran (arvvenka)' ; Gengxuesong (Geng
Xuesong) ; 'spring@ietf.org' ;
'Rishabh Parekh (riparekh)'
Subject: 答复: [spring] 答复:
I support as co-author.
Footer
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2021 08:34
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt
Dear WG:
The IPPM WG has adopted
I support the adoption of this draft.
Regards,
Samuel
From: spring On Behalf Of Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
(jrajaman)
Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 3:25 PM
To: James Guichard ; spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for
I support
From: James Guichard
Date: Monday, June 7, 2021 at 8:34 AM
To: "spring@ietf.org"
Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-06.txt
Dear WG:
The IPPM WG has adopted
Dear WG:
The IPPM WG has adopted
Hi yali，
Thank you very much for informing me of the existing
draft-song-ippm-ioam-tunnel-mode-00.
For draft-song-ippm-ioam-tunnel-mode-00, I have a little question, which is
also the problem that bothers me when I write
draft-qiu-spring-srv6-ioam-encap-model-00.
In uniform model,
13 matches
Mail list logo
