On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 11:32, Brian E Carpenter
wrote:
>
> Thanks for this draft.
>
> Question: where you show "Source address 2001:db8:a:1100::" is that intended
> to be the complete address, because it looks like a prefix? I can't find
> anywhere that an interface identifier of zero is
Mark,
I seriously wonder as I see all this if it wasn’t a mistake to not declare srv6
an entirely new protocol with a new protocol number back at the start of this.
Because it looks more and more like Robert was right when he said that srv6 was
not ipv6 - that or we seem to have forgotten the
> I can't find anywhere that an interface identifier of zero is forbidden
However, when I assign such an address to a Linux box, it is unpingable, so I'm
guessing it breaks neighbor discovery.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 17-Oct-21 13:31, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Thanks for this draft.
>
>
Thanks for this draft.
Question: where you show "Source address 2001:db8:a:1100::" is that intended to
be the complete address, because it looks like a prefix? I can't find anywhere
that an interface identifier of zero is forbidden, but it's unusual, and can
only exist once in a given subnet.
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, 06:36 Michael Richardson, wrote:
>
> Mark Smith wrote:
> > In fight changing DAs also will break AH protection of the IPv6 header.
>
> AH is dead. It's been dead for decades.
> I say this as an IPsec enthusiast who wishes this wasn't true.
> But it is.
Then all IPv6
Ted,
On 15-Oct-21 23:39, Ted Hardie wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:06 PM Brian E Carpenter
> mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 14-Oct-21 22:41, Ted Hardie wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:28 PM Brian E Carpenter
> mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>
>
Mark Smith wrote:
> In fight changing DAs also will break AH protection of the IPv6 header.
AH is dead. It's been dead for decades.
I say this as an IPsec enthusiast who wishes this wasn't true.
But it is.
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
Hi Dear WG，
I support the adoption of this draft.
I think this proposal merges the G-SID and micor-SID mechanizm successfully
based on the standardized SRH format and gets well support by the main stream
chip vendor. It does help reducing the SRv6 SID size in a brilliant way.
Thanks
BR
Roy
