Re: [spring] [pim] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy

As a co-author, I support the progressing of this draft. Jeffrey Juniper Business Use Only From: pim On Behalf Of Rishabh Parekh Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 5:17 PM To: Michael McBride Cc: p...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [pim] [spring] wglc: draft-ietf-pim-sr-p2mp-policy

Re: [spring] Request comments/feedback on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-spring-microtap-segment/01/

SID of the owner of the microtap SID to get to the owner node (who advertised the microtap SID). Jeffrey Juniper Business Use Only From: Gurminderjit Bajwa Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2024 4:41 PM To: Joel Halpern Cc: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; spring@ietf.org; draft-zzhang-spring-microtap

Re: [spring] Request comments/feedback on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-spring-microtap-segment/01/

Hi Eduard, Please see zzh2> below. Juniper Business Use Only From: Eduard Metz Sent: Sunday, March 3, 2024 7:14 AM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang Cc: Jeff Tantsura ; Ryan Hoffman ; spring@ietf.org; draft-zzhang-spring-microtap-segm...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] Request comments/feedb

Re: [spring] Request comments/feedback on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-spring-microtap-segment/01/

Hi Robert, Juniper Business Use Only From: Robert Raszuk Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 12:14 PM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang Cc: Eduard Metz ; Jeff Tantsura ; Ryan Hoffman ; spring@ietf.org; draft-zzhang-spring-microtap-segm...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] Request comments/feedback on https

Re: [spring] Request comments/feedback on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-spring-microtap-segment/01/

Hi Ed, Jeff, Thanks for your comments. Please see zzh> below. Juniper Business Use Only From: Eduard Metz Sent: Friday, March 1, 2024 6:42 AM To: Jeff Tantsura Cc: Ryan Hoffman ; Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; spring@ietf.org; draft-zzhang-spring-microtap-segm...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spr

[spring] Request comments/feedback on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-spring-microtap-segment/01/

Hi, The authors of this draft would like to get your feedback on this draft. This document specifies a microTap segment that can be used to instruct a transit node to make a copy of a segment-routed packet and deliver it to a specified node for the purpose of network monitoring,

Re: [spring] Issue #1: VPN SID in Multicast //RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment

Hi Jingrong, Rishabh, For the case where a tunnel is used for multiple VPNs, how to demultiplex traffic at a tunnel leaf is totally independent of replication SID. It's actually outside the scope of this draft in WGLC. It's true that we want to make sure that the replication SID will work with

Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment

Hi, Replication trees built with replication segments do have per-tree state. However please consider the following: While an SR network does not need per-path state for unicast, it does not mean that multicast must strictly follow the same. Any of the following could be used, depending on an

Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment

I am not aware of undisclosed IPR related to this draft. Juniper Business Use Only From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 10:10 AM To: SPRING WG Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment [External Email.

Re: [spring] A question about End.MVPN SID in draft-wang-spring-multicast-vpn-segment-00

A related comment on this draft - the pseudo code says: * S01. If (V bit in End.MVPN = 1) { * S02. Look up the End.MVPN mapping table according to End.MVPN, find out the associated RD and the related MFIB(VRF) table T. * S03. Remove the outer IPv6 header with all its

Re: [spring] [Rift] WG Adoption call for draft-zzhang-rift-sr-04

Hi, The adoption call has ended. We have enough support from regular RIFT contributors and the draft is adopted. Thanks! Jeffrey Juniper Business Use Only -Original Message- From: RIFT On Behalf Of Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang Sent: Friday, June 10, 2022 4:15 PM To: Tom Hill ; r

Re: [spring] [bess] [Pals] [EXTERNAL] Re: Martini Pseudowires and SR

Regarding feature gaps, I’d like to point to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zzhang-pals-pw-for-ip-udp-payload-01 for a new kind of PW. I had not got to socialize it in PALS/MPLS WG and will fill in the signaling details in the next revision (yes, EVPN-VPWS type of signaling is what

Re: [spring] [Rift] WG Adoption call for draft-zzhang-rift-sr-04

-zzhang-rift-sr-04 [External Email. Be cautious of content] On 27/05/2022 14:16, Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang wrote: > This starts a two-week WG adoption call for draft-zzhang-rift-sr-04. Has the draft been solicited anywhere prior to the adoption call? I can't see any emails, or an agenda item f

Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/

I oppose for the same reasons as well. From: spring On Behalf Of Tarek Saad Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 12:05 AM To: James Guichard ; SPRING WG Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for

Re: [spring] Error / Calls regarding adoption of draft-ietf-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

I support the adoption, though we do still need to reach consensus on the long discussion on whether replication segment should be reused/extended for the replication node. Jeffrey -Original Message- From: spring On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 8:08 AM

Re: [spring] SR and DetNet, draft on sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Fan, Catching up on this late … You said: * Triggered by the discussions in SPRING, I think we can define redundancy segment and merging segment as a functional segment without routing and topological semantics, and use different segment for the routing purpose. Thus, redundancy

Re: [spring] 答复: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Fan, Coming back to this topic after a long time – been busy with lots of things. Please see zzh2> below. From: Yangfan (IP Standard) mailto:shirley.yang...@huawei.com>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 8:20 AM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang mailto:zzh...@juniper.net>>;

Re: [spring] 答复: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

comment starts with Fan1>>. Regards, Fan 发件人: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang [mailto:zzh...@juniper.net] 发送时间: 2021年5月27日 3:37 收件人: Yangfan (IP Standard) mailto:shirley.yang...@huawei.com>>; 'Rishabh Parekh' mailto:risha...@gmail.com>> 抄送: 'Arvind Venkateswaran (arvvenka)' mailto:

Re: [spring] 答复: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Fan, Please see zzh1> below. From: Yangfan (IP Standard) Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 12:11 PM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; 'Rishabh Parekh' Cc: 'Arvind Venkateswaran (arvvenka)' ; Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) ; 'spring@ietf.org' ; 'Rishabh Parekh (riparekh)' Subject: 答复: [spring]

Re: [spring] 答复: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Fan, In this thread I’ll address another point that I deferred. I snipped unrelated text. Zzh6> It’s important to distinguish between control plane and data plane. In data plane it is always a simple SID (replication or redundancy). In control plane (that sets up the

Re: [spring] 答复: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Fan, In this email I will focus on two points that I deferred earlier. I snipped unrelated text. … Fan 4>>: I re-thought the adding of FI/SN last week. Adding FI at the SR ingress node may also bring benefits. Ingress node usually identifies the service, for example L3VPN service, or

Re: [spring] Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

21 8:59 AM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; 'Rishabh Parekh' Cc: Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) ; 'Rishabh Parekh (riparekh)' ; 'Arvind Venkateswaran (arvvenka)' ; 'spring@ietf.org' Subject: 答复: [spring] RE: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi J

Re: [spring] Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Fan, Sorry for the late response. Please see zzh> below. From: Yangfan (IP Standard) Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 9:20 AM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; 'Rishabh Parekh' Cc: Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) ; 'Rishabh Parekh (riparekh)' ; 'Arvind Venkateswaran (arvvenka)' ; 'spring@ietf.

Re: [spring] [DMM] note: WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

blo. -Original Message- From: dmm On Behalf Of Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang Sent: miércoles, 21 de abril de 2021 6:49 To: Erik Kline ; SPRING WG ; d...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] [spring] note: WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11 Hi, I noticed this late and just did a rushed rev

Re: [spring] 答复: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Please ignore this incomplete message. Sent by accident. From: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 11:04 AM To: Yangfan (IP Standard) ; Rishabh Parekh Cc: Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) ; Rishabh Parekh (riparekh) ; Arvind Venkateswaran (arvvenka) ; spring@ietf.org Subject: RE

Re: [spring] 答复: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Fan, Enjoy your holidays and we can continue the discussion after that, but let me reply here while it is still fresh in my head. Please see zzh5> below. From: Yangfan (IP Standard) Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 11:16 PM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; Rishabh Parekh Cc: Gengxuesong (G

Re: [spring] 答复: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

d) Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2021 6:31 AM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; Rishabh Parekh Cc: Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) ; Rishabh Parekh (riparekh) ; Arvind Venkateswaran (arvvenka) ; spring@ietf.org Subject: 答复: [spring] 答复: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection [External Email. Be ca

Re: [spring] 答复: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Fan, Please see zzh3> below. From: Yangfan (IP Standard) Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 6:42 AM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; Rishabh Parekh Cc: Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) ; Rishabh Parekh (riparekh) ; Arvind Venkateswaran (arvvenka) ; spring@ietf.org Subject: 答复: [spring] 答复: Comme

Re: [spring] note: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-11

Hi, I noticed this late and just did a rushed review of the document, so pardon if my questions and comments do not make sense. End.Map seems to be rather generic and not specific to DMM. Should it be extracted out to a spring document? It seems that there is no real difference between

Re: [spring] 答复: Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Rishabh, Thanks for chiming in on the End behavior point! Hi Fan, Please see zzh2 below for other points. From: Rishabh Parekh Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 3:10 PM To: Yangfan (IP Standard) Cc: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) ; Rishabh Parekh (riparekh) ; Arvind

Re: [spring] Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Fan, Please see zzh> below. From: Yangfan (IP Standard) mailto:shirley.yang...@huawei.com>> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:58 PM To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang mailto:zzhang=40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org>>; Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) mailto:gengxues...@huawei.com>&

[spring] Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection

Hi Xuesong, Mach, Fan, Some comments/questions on the proposal. 1. We don't need an additional "redundancy segment" for the replication semantics. Existing "replication segment" (draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment) can be used as is, especially for the scenario where the original header

Re: [spring] WG adoption call for draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment

As co-author I support the adoption, and commit to continuing the work to progress it. Thanks. Jeffrey Juniper Business Use Only -Original Message- From: spring On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 7:46 AM To: spring@ietf.org Subject: [spring] WG

Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Hi Greg, all, Please see zzh> below. From: Greg Mirsky Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2019 7:07 PM To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Cc: John E Drake ; spring@ietf.org; Alexander Vainshtein ; draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org; Robert Raszuk ;

Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Hi Sasha, Please see zzh> below. From: Alexander Vainshtein Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2019 11:25 AM To: Greg Mirsky ; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Cc: John E Drake ; spring@ietf.org; draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org; Robert Raszuk ; (spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org)

Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Hi Sasha, Ketan, Greg, John, all, I hope my email (attached) in response to Sasha’s original email, answers many questions brought up in this thread. Thanks. Jeffrey From: Alexander Vainshtein Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2019 3:00 PM To: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) Cc: John E Drake ;

Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Hi, Please see some clarifications below. -Original Message- From: Alexander Vainshtein Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 5:12 PM To: (spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org) ; draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org Cc: spring@ietf.org Subject: RE: [spring] The SPRING WG

Re: [spring] IPR Poll: draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment

Hi, I am not aware of any IPRs related to this document. Thanks. Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang From: bruno.decra...@orange.com mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 9:04 AM To:

Re: [spring] Some questions regarding Replication SID

Vainshtein Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:40 AM To: Rishabh Parekh (riparekh) Cc: spring@ietf.org; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) ; hooman.bidg...@nokia.com; Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; daniel.vo...@bell.ca Subject: RE: Some questions regarding Replication SID Rishabh, FYI, the MVPN