Re: [spring] [Idr] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

Thanks, Stefano. Bruno, at your convenience can you confirm that you're satisfied with the resolution? Looks OK to me even though the changes don't precisely adhere to your suggestions ("Link NLRI uses the Protocol-ID value" instead of "Link NLRI uses the BGP Protocol-ID value"). The rfcdiff

Re: [spring] [Idr] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

Hi Authors,I see that yesterday's -10 revision doesn't address Bruno's comments, below. Can you please either update the document if you accept Bruno's suggestions, or otherwise discuss them on the list? We can't declare the WGLC to be satisfactorily finished until this is resolved.Thanks,--JohnOn

Re: [spring] New spring WG Co-Chair

Hi Everybody, I'd like to thank everyone for an interesting three years. I'd particularly like to thank Bruno for being such an outstanding co-chair, it has been an absolute pleasure to work with him. Martin, welcome and thanks for your willingness to step up. Regards, --John > On Jul 26,

[spring] Minutes of IETF-96 SPRING posted

Hi Everyone, Minutes are now available at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-spring. Please send any corrections or comments to the list. Thanks to Wim for the notes! --John ___ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org

[spring] WG adoption requested for draft‐filsfils‐spring‐large-scale-interconnect

Dear WG, As we discussed at our meeting, working group adoption has been requested for draft‐filsfils‐spring‐large-scale-interconnect. Please reply to the list with your comments, including although not limited to whether or not you support adoption. Non-authors are especially encouraged to

[spring] WG adoption requested for draft-filsfils-spring-sr-recursing-info

Dear WG, As we discussed at our meeting, working group adoption has been requested for draft-filsfils-spring-sr-recursing-info. Please reply to the list with your comments, including although not limited to whether or not you support adoption. Non-authors are especially encouraged to comment.

[spring] IPR for draft‐ietf-spring-segment‐routing-mpls prior to WGLC

Dear Authors: As we discussed at the SPRING meeting, working group last call has been requested for draft‐ietf-spring-segment‐routing-mpls. Before we begin the WGLC, please indicate whether you are aware of any relevant IPR and if so, whether it has been disclosed. (Please do this even if

[spring] IPR for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe prior to WGLC

Dear Authors: As we discussed at the SPRING meeting, working group last call has been requested for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe. Before we begin the WGLC, please indicate whether you are aware of any relevant IPR and if so, whether it has been disclosed. (Please do this even

[spring] IPR for draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase prior to WGLC

[re-sending with WG in cc. Please cc WG on your replies, thanks and sorry for the dup.] Dear Authors: As we discussed at the SPRING meeting, working group last call has been requested for draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase. Before we begin the WGLC, please indicate whether you are aware of any

[spring] WG adoption requested for draft-psarkar-spring-mpls-anycast-segments

Dear WG (and cc MPLS, please include SPRING in replies), As we discussed at our meeting, working group adoption has been requested for draft-psarkar-spring-mpls-anycast-segments. Please reply to the list with your comments, including although not limited to whether or not you support adoption.

Re: [spring] working group adoption call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-central-epe

The document is accepted as a WG document. Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-spring, adjusting the author/contributor lists as needed when you do. Thanks, --John > On Jul 22, 2015, at 9:15 AM, John G.Scudder wrote: > > Dear WG, > > As we discussed at our meeting

Re: [spring] working group adoption call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop

The document is accepted as a WG document. Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-spring, adjusting the author/contributor lists as needed when you do. Thanks, --John > On Jul 22, 2015, at 9:17 AM, John G. Scudder <j...@juniper.net> wrote: > > Dear WG, > > As we dis

[spring] Call for note-taker, jabber scribe, November 3 SPRING meeting

Hi All, As you know we will meet at IETF-94 on Tuesday November 3 at 09:00. Our agenda is very full and there is no chance we will make the best use of it if we don't have a note-taker arranged in advance. On some occasions I have picked up the slack myself rather than hold up the meeting, but

Re: [spring] working group adoption call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-msdc

Hi All, This document is adopted as a SPRING WG document. Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-spring. When resubmitting, please don't forget to sort out the author list as discussed below. Thanks, – John > On Jul 22, 2015, at 9:15 AM, John G.Scudder wrote: > > Dear WG,

[spring] WG adoption calls (4x) and last call ending Monday

SPRING fans, In case you had forgotten or were saving your comments til the end, we have the following under way, to end on August 31 (Monday): - working group last call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing - working group adoption call for draft-geib-spring-oam-usecase - working group

[spring] SPRING WGLC of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing

[Sigh, it's isis...@ietf.org, not i...@ietf.org. Sloppy of me. Resending to isis-wg for this and the others, and to SPRING, but not re-cc'ing the rest of the other WGs. Sorry about that.] Dear IS-IS, OSPF, MPLS, 6MAN Working Groups, As you probably know, SPRING's work relates to your working

[spring] working group last call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing

Dear SPRING WG (and cc MPLS, OSPF, IS-IS, 6MAN, please include SPRING in replies per the reply-to): As we discussed at the SPRING meeting yesterday, working group last call has been requested for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing. Please reply to the list with your comments, including although

[spring] working group adoption call for draft-geib-spring-oam-usecase

Dear WG, As we discussed at our meeting yesterday, working group adoption has been requested for draft-geib-spring-oam-usecase. Please reply to the list with your comments, including although not limited to whether or not you support adoption. Non-authors are especially encouraged to comment.

[spring] IPR in SPRING

Hi Everyone, Alvaro recently sent a set of requests to authors to be sure they have disclosed any relevant IPR, and of course they should. In addition, we wanted to take this opportunity to remind the entire WG that the duty of disclosure is NOT limited to authors. Here are some excerpts from