Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/

I support adoption. The document describes changes that are consistent with existing SRv6-related RFCs, and I find the objection about multiple apparent data plane solutions to be puzzling at best. pdm From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 9:05

Re: [spring] IPR Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document. pdm From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2021 5:34 AM To: SPRING WG Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [spring] IPR Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy Hi Authors,

Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming

Support. pdm From: spring On Behalf Of bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 11:50 AM To: SPRING WG Cc: draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org Subject: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming Hi

Re: [spring] Which SID is used to represent links when both of them have same IP address.

Someone else can correct me, but I believe that the two VRFs would represent two different instances of SR. One SR instance would have an adjacency SID that represented forwarding over the first interface, and the other would have an adjacency SID that represented forwarding over the other.

Re: [spring] Updating the SPRING WG Charter

We don’t have domain-wide labels. We have domain-wide indices. The same index is represented with different label values by different hosts, depending on their SRGBs. pdm From: spring On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 9:59 AM To: Alexander Vainshtein Cc:

Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy

As a co-author, I support adoption of this draft. pdm From: spring On Behalf Of Rob Shakir Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 10:20 AM To: SPRING WG List Subject: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy

Re: [spring] IPR Poll for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this document. pdm From: spring On Behalf Of Rob Shakir Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 10:20 AM To: SPRING WG List Subject: [spring] IPR Poll for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy Hi SPRING

[spring] WG adoption of draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy?

Hello SPRING WG chairs - Would this be a good time to consider WG adoption of draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy? It is part of the WG charter and is likely mature enough at this point. pdm ___ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org

Re: [spring] SPRING - rechartering discussion

I feel it is essential that the SPRING WG continues and extends its work, and remains the locus of activity on segment routing issues. In particular, the work on segment routing traffic engineering (SR-TE) has reached a critical point, both in terms of the standards work and our (Microsoft's)