Adrian:

No, it isn’t your review.

We’re forwarding the use case documents along with the Architecture to the IESG 
at the same time – we’re waiting for that last document.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On 8/26/17, 5:42 AM, "Adrian Farrel" <adr...@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

As I said in my review, I think this document is useful and should be 
published. So I am concerned that there is no progress. I hope it isn't my 
review that is slowing things down.

What are the plans for this document?



_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to