Adrian: No, it isn’t your review.
We’re forwarding the use case documents along with the Architecture to the IESG at the same time – we’re waiting for that last document. Thanks! Alvaro. On 8/26/17, 5:42 AM, "Adrian Farrel" <adr...@olddog.co.uk> wrote: As I said in my review, I think this document is useful and should be published. So I am concerned that there is no progress. I hope it isn't my review that is slowing things down. What are the plans for this document? _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring