Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Thanks Pablo! I’m clearing my DISCUSS. Alvaro. On October 7, 2020 at 12:08:27 PM, Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) ( pcama...@cisco.com) wrote: Note that we have just posted rev24 as per the comments below. ___ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org; Bruno Decraene ; spring-cha...@ietf.org; Joel Halpern ; spring@ietf.org Subject: RE: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) On September 30, 2020 at 9:18:37 AM, Pablo Camarillo wrote: Pablo

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alvaro, at this point as document shepherd I have to ask if these are still discuss level concerns? Yours, Joel On 10/7/2020 11:04 AM, Alvaro Retana wrote: On September 30, 2020 at 9:18:37 AM, Pablo Camarillo wrote: Pablo: Hi! Just leaving below the points I still want to talk about.

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On September 30, 2020 at 9:18:37 AM, Pablo Camarillo wrote: Pablo: Hi! Just leaving below the points I still want to talk about. Thanks! Alvaro. ... > > -- > > DISCUSS: > >

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On 23/9/20 21:22, Erik Kline wrote: (5) This point is for the IESG to discuss. §4.16.1.2 :       The End, End.X and End.T behaviors with PSP do not contravene       Section 4 of [RFC8200] because the destination address of the       incoming packet is

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Pablo & IESG, May I ask why, if you are going against RFC8754, you do it in this documents as opposed to formally update RFC8754? Put another way: what was the point of 6man (and eventually the IETF) of standardizing RFC8754 if then this document is going to change the spec without formally

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Sent: martes, 29 de septiembre de 2020 0:50 To: The IESG ; Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) Cc: Joel Halpern ; spring-cha...@ietf.org; Bruno Decraene ; spring@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org Subject: RE: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On September 25, 2020 at 2:28:53 PM, Pablo Camarillo wrote: Pablo: Hi! I still have a couple of comments related to the DISCUSS portion.  And some non-blocking comments later on. I looked at -22. Thanks! Alvaro. > -- >

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Bruno Decraene > ; Joel Halpern > Subject: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on > draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: Discuss > >

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

the draft.) Thanks, Pablo. -Original Message- From: Alvaro Retana via Datatracker Sent: miércoles, 23 de septiembre de 2020 22:58 To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; Bruno Decraene ; Joel Halpern Subject

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Retana via Datatracker Sent: miércoles, 23 de septiembre de 2020 22:58 To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; Bruno Decraene ; Joel Halpern Subject: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (wi

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

...@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; Bruno Decraene ; Joel Halpern Subject: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Re: [spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

> > (5) This point is for the IESG to discuss. > > §4.16.1.2: > > The End, End.X and End.T behaviors with PSP do not contravene > Section 4 of [RFC8200] because the destination address of the > incoming packet is the address of the node executing the behavior. > > The spring WG's

[spring] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-20: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)