Re: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt)

2020-01-07 Thread Ron Bonica
...@gmail.com; spring@ietf.org; daniel.vo...@bell.ca Subject: Re: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt) Ron, Happy New Year. You may have forgotten the conversation that we had in December where I replied to this same question

Re: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt)

2020-01-07 Thread Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Bonica Date: Sunday, 29 December 2019 at 18:38 To: "Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)" , "weibin.w...@nokia-sbell.com" , "hayabusa...@gmail.com" Cc: "spring@ietf.org" , "Voyer, Daniel" Subject: RE: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in

Re: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt)

2019-12-29 Thread Ron Bonica
Subject: Re: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt) Ron, Gyan, Sections 4.4 to 4.8 of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming define the local dataplane processing on the egress PE. As far as L3VPN signaling is concerned

Re: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt)

2019-12-20 Thread Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
etf.org" , "Voyer, Daniel" Subject: RE: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt) Pablo, In L3VPN, all of these are combined into a single 20-bit MPLS label. Why can SRv6 not do likewise?

Re: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt)

2019-12-19 Thread Gyan Mishra
AM > *To:* Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai) ; > Gyan Mishra > *Cc:* spring@ietf.org; Voyer, Daniel > *Subject:* [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in > draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt) > > > > Gyan, > > > > The End.DX4/End.DX6

Re: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt)

2019-12-19 Thread Gyan Mishra
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 6:47 AM Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) < pcama...@cisco.com> wrote: > Gyan, > > > > The End.DX4/End.DX6 can be seen as an equivalent to the MPLS per-CE VPN > label. > > The End.DT4/End.DT6 can be seen as an equivalent to the MPLS per-VRF VPN > label. > > > > I believe that they

Re: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt)

2019-12-19 Thread Ron Bonica
, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai) ; Gyan Mishra Cc: spring@ietf.org; Voyer, Daniel Subject: [spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt) Gyan, The End.DX4/End.DX6 can be seen as an equivalent to the MPLS per-CE VPN label. The End.DT4/End.DT6

[spring] End.DT/End.DX SIDs (was Re: USD/USP question in draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-06.txt)

2019-12-19 Thread Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Gyan, The End.DX4/End.DX6 can be seen as an equivalent to the MPLS per-CE VPN label. The End.DT4/End.DT6 can be seen as an equivalent to the MPLS per-VRF VPN label. I believe that they cannot be combined. Cheers, Pablo. From: Gyan Mishra Date: Sunday, 15 December 2019 at 08:29 To: "Wang, Weibi