Hi Tal,
Thanks for the feedback.
We moved the draft to the IPPM WG based on the interest we have seen from the
IPPM WG during IETF 118.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfils-ippm-path-tracing/00/
I agree it could be made generic to the IPv6 data plane. Today we have a small
Dear authors,
A couple of questions:
1. Why not decouple the IPv6 path tracing option from SRv6? It does
not seem to be strictly SRv6 related. You could potentially define the
relevant SRv6 endpoint behavior in a separate draft.
2. Would it be possible to use the ICMPv6 Loopback message with an
