well, I think you missed how routing headers are handled in ipv6.
Please read rfc2460 section 4.4 and then draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header
section 4 and especially section 4.3.
You’ll see that the routing header is not an mpls label stack.
s.
> On Apr 29, 2016, at 9:29 AM,
If we consider SRH insertion with IPv6 PHP, the original destination address
would be lost when removing the SRH,
The packet reaches the egress with a DA that matches egress address, but no
other information how to forward the packet to its final destination
[Orange
There are many operators and use cases where, instead of encapsulation, srh
insertion is a far better option.
In fact all current implementations are doing srh insertion.
Still, from a spec perspective, the srh processis the same.
s.
-Original Message-
From: rabah.gued...@orange.com
