Re: [spring] Issue with path protection for SR-TE LSPs

2016-09-30 Thread Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
liency-use-ca...@ietf.org; Marina Fizgeer; Rotem Cohen; > DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) > Subject: RE: [spring] Issue with path protection for SR-TE LSPs > > Stephane, > Lots of thanks for an important clarification. > > But don’t you think that in addition to

Re: [spring] Issue with path protection for SR-TE LSPs

2016-09-27 Thread Alexander Vainshtein
Shell Nakash <shell.nak...@ecitele.com>; Michael Gorokhovsky <michael.gorokhov...@ecitele.com>; draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-ca...@ietf.org; Marina Fizgeer <marina.fizg...@ecitele.com>; Rotem Cohen <rotem.co...@ecitele.com> Subject: RE: [spring] Issue with path protection

Re: [spring] Issue with path protection for SR-TE LSPs

2016-09-27 Thread stephane.litkowski
y-use-ca...@ietf.org; Marina Fizgeer; Rotem Cohen Subject: Re: [spring] Issue with path protection for SR-TE LSPs Stefano, Bruno and all, Lots of thanks for detailed responses that, frankly, now go much deeper than my original question. My concern was about combining "regular" prefix SID

Re: [spring] Issue with path protection for SR-TE LSPs

2016-09-27 Thread bruno.decraene
Hi Stefano, As an individual contributor, please find a comment inline > From: Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) [mailto:sprev...@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, > September 26, 2016 11:22 AM > > > > > > On Sep 26, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) > > wrote: >