Dhairs, working group,
I agree with Matthew, we should standardize one single data plane
behavior for IPv6 compression.
/Loa
> compressing SRv6 information
On 18/08/2021 19:35, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) wrote:
Joel
Yes, I believe the WG should standardize a single data plane solution.
Hello,
As said previously, it is imperative for the industry to have a single
standardized solution.
Many Thanks,
-- Brd
-Original Message-
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 10:28 PM
To: Joel M. Halpern ; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring]
Hi Folks,
The “new term” discussion has been lasted for a while, thanks to all who
participated in the discussion.
So far it seems there are some rough consensus about this “new term” (maybe I
am wrong) :
1. It is better to have a neutral term, which allows this underlay construct to
be used
I support to have only one data plane compressing solution.
Having more than one behaviors standardized means that vendors will need to
support all the solutions, and before that happens there will be
interoperability issues, essentially zero solution.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
> On Aug 4, 2021, at
