Re: [spring] Please count the SRv6 for Mobile work [was Re: SPRING - rechartering discussion]

All, I agree with Satoru. The Spring WG should be a central place to review the SR related work at DMM and the other WGs. Thanks Regards … Zafar On 3/23/18, 6:01 AM, "spring on behalf of Satoru Matsushima" wrote:

Re: [spring] 答复: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: SPRING - rechartering discussion

I think useful to breakdown some aspects about SR policies: - related to candidate paths instantiation/reporting/update –via PCEP, BGP, et. al – and related extensions.. IMO, there’s some work to be done there - related path computation/formulation/validation – it’s clear SR paths are not 1:1

[spring] Please count the SRv6 for Mobile work [was Re: SPRING - rechartering discussion]

Hello SPRING folks, Let me share an ongoing work in DMM WG that makes SRv6 to be able to provide mobility management path on user plane: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane So please count it when you consider rechartering. But it doesn’t mean that SPRING WG is