I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document
Luay
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 5:34 AM James Guichard <
james.n.guich...@futurewei.com> wrote:
> Hi Authors, Contributors, WG
>
>
>
> Authors of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy have asked for WG last
> call. In preparation of
Hello,
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR associated with this draft
Regards,
Jose
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2021 3:34 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] IPR Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
Hi Authors,
Hi Rishabh,
Thanks for chiming in on the End behavior point!
Hi Fan,
Please see zzh2 below for other points.
From: Rishabh Parekh
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 3:10 PM
To: Yangfan (IP Standard)
Cc: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
; Rishabh Parekh (riparekh) ;
Arvind
Fan,
Zzh> RFC 8986 does specify additional flavors of End and End.X function
with USP, PSP and USD behaviors which are modifications to base End and
End.X function; exactly what we are proposing here – enhancing Replication
Segment to add (FI,SN) when required.
Fan>> can you explain more? I
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.
pdm
From: spring On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2021 5:34 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [spring] IPR Call for
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
Hi Authors,
Hello Jim/Chairs,
I am not aware of any IPR related to this document other than the ones that
have been already disclosed.
Rgds
--
Kamran
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Sunday, April 11, 2021 at 6:34 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] IPR Call for
Hi Jim, chairs,
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.
Thanks,
Francois
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Sunday, 11 April 2021 at 12:34
To: SPRING WG
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] IPR Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
Hi
Hi Weiqiang,
thank you for looking into it!
Concerning address aggregation and SID summarization you are probably
right: When keeping the reqirements generic 4.2.4 should cover the
requirement of "address aggregation".
In my eyes, creating another company-wide concept for SID delegation and
Hi,
I am not aware of any IPR related to this document other than the ones that
have been already disclosed.
Thanks
Dan
From: spring on behalf of James Guichard
Date: Sunday, April 11, 2021 at 6:34 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [spring] IPR Call for
