Thank you. I think it would help if this were spelled out more clearly
in the draft.
Yours,
Joel
On 7/26/2020 3:32 PM, Francois Clad (fclad) wrote:
Hi Joel,
Thank you for your email.
At high-level, the dynamic proxy combines a caching mechanism with a mapping
scheme that associates cache
Hi Joel,
Thank you for your email.
At high-level, the dynamic proxy combines a caching mechanism with a mapping
scheme that associates cache entries to packets or flows.
There are many possible mapping schemes, each has pros and cons that make it
more suitable in some environments and less in
Thank you. That does clarify, and it would probably be good to be
explicit in the document. (The restriction makes sense, we just need to
be clear.)
Yours,
Joel
On 7/25/2020 8:31 PM, Stefano Salsano wrote:
Il 2020-07-25 19:49, Joel M. Halpern ha scritto:
In looking at the description of
Il 2020-07-25 19:49, Joel M. Halpern ha scritto:
In looking at the description of the dyanmic proxy behavior, I was
reminded of a problem that the SFC working group wrestled with and never
resolved to our satisfaction. (In the SFC case, since we were not
specifying the behavior of the
In looking at the description of the dyanmic proxy behavior, I was
reminded of a problem that the SFC working group wrestled with and never
resolved to our satisfaction. (In the SFC case, since we were not
specifying the behavior of the proxy, we could leave it to implementors.
This
