Re: [spring] Updates to draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls
Hi Loa, Thank you for the review comments. Please see inline with ... On 2019-05-22, 2:40 AM, "Loa Andersson" wrote: Rakesh, A couple of thoughts and questions. - is it necessary to have three different ways to establish the IOAM Indicator Label? There are three options possible, but after some discussions with the WGs, we can pick one or more. - if it is necessary to use a Special Purpose Label, could you use a eSPL instead of a bSPL (for terminology see draft-andersson-mpls- spl-terminology)? We can use eSL (e.g. label value 18). - will the label serving as as IOAM Indicator always be a the bottom of the stack and have the s-bit set? That may be easier, need to see if there is any complication that can come with it though. - allocating SPL's is a decision that I would want the MPLS working group to take, this could be done in one of two ways, either we progress in the mpls wg or you split out the IANA allocation in a separate document and progress that in the mpls wg. Ok. At this time, we can keep both WGs in the loop with one document. Thanks, Rakesh /Loa On 2019-05-22 06:49, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote: > Hi WG, > > We have published an update to the following draft: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/ > > /draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/ defines how IOAM data fields are > transported with SR-MPLS encapsulation. The draft has been updated as > following:// > > 1. Add different methods of IOAM Indicator Label in Section 4.1. > 2. Add Hashing function in Section 4.2. > 3. Add Node capability in Section 4.3. > 4. Cleanup/editorial changes > > Welcome your review comments and suggestions. > > Thanks, > > Rakesh (on behalf of co-authors and contributors) > > > ___ > spring mailing list > spring@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring > -- Loa Anderssonemail: l...@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64 ___ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
Re: [spring] Updates to draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls
Rakesh, A couple of thoughts and questions. - is it necessary to have three different ways to establish the IOAM Indicator Label? - if it is necessary to use a Special Purpose Label, could you use a eSPL instead of a bSPL (for terminology see draft-andersson-mpls- spl-terminology)? - will the label serving as as IOAM Indicator always be a the bottom of the stack and have the s-bit set? - allocating SPL's is a decision that I would want the MPLS working group to take, this could be done in one of two ways, either we progress in the mpls wg or you split out the IANA allocation in a separate document and progress that in the mpls wg. /Loa On 2019-05-22 06:49, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote: Hi WG, We have published an update to the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/ /draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/ defines how IOAM data fields are transported with SR-MPLS encapsulation. The draft has been updated as following:// 1. Add different methods of IOAM Indicator Label in Section 4.1. 2. Add Hashing function in Section 4.2. 3. Add Node capability in Section 4.3. 4. Cleanup/editorial changes Welcome your review comments and suggestions. Thanks, Rakesh (on behalf of co-authors and contributors) ___ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring -- Loa Anderssonemail: l...@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64 ___ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
[spring] Updates to draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls
Hi WG, We have published an update to the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/ draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls defines how IOAM data fields are transported with SR-MPLS encapsulation. The draft has been updated as following: 1. Add different methods of IOAM Indicator Label in Section 4.1. 2. Add Hashing function in Section 4.2. 3. Add Node capability in Section 4.3. 4. Cleanup/editorial changes Welcome your review comments and suggestions. Thanks, Rakesh (on behalf of co-authors and contributors) ___ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring