Re: [spring] Updates to draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls

2019-05-24 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi Loa,

Thank you for the review comments. Please see inline with ...

On 2019-05-22, 2:40 AM, "Loa Andersson"  wrote:


Rakesh,

A couple of thoughts and questions.

- is it necessary to have three different ways to establish the
   IOAM Indicator Label?

 There are three options possible, but after some discussions with the WGs, 
we can pick one or more.

- if it is necessary to use a Special Purpose Label, could you use
   a eSPL instead of a bSPL (for terminology see draft-andersson-mpls-
   spl-terminology)?

 We can use eSL (e.g. label value 18).

- will the label serving as as IOAM Indicator always be a the bottom
   of the stack and have the s-bit set?

 That may be easier, need to see if there is any complication that can come 
with it though.

- allocating SPL's is a decision that I would want the MPLS working
   group to take, this could be done in one of two ways, either we
   progress in the mpls wg or you split out the IANA allocation in a
   separate document and progress that in the mpls wg.

 Ok. At this time, we can keep both WGs in the loop with one document.

Thanks,
Rakesh


/Loa

On 2019-05-22 06:49, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote:
> Hi WG,
> 
> We have published an update to the following draft:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/
> 
> /draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/ defines how IOAM data fields are 
> transported with SR-MPLS encapsulation. The draft has been updated as 
> following://
> 
>  1. Add different methods of IOAM Indicator Label in Section 4.1.
>  2. Add Hashing function in Section 4.2.
>  3. Add Node capability in Section 4.3.
>  4. Cleanup/editorial changes
> 
> Welcome your review comments and suggestions.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rakesh (on behalf of co-authors and contributors)
> 
> 
> ___
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
> 

-- 


Loa Anderssonemail: l...@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64


___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring


Re: [spring] Updates to draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls

2019-05-22 Thread Loa Andersson



Rakesh,

A couple of thoughts and questions.

- is it necessary to have three different ways to establish the
  IOAM Indicator Label?
- if it is necessary to use a Special Purpose Label, could you use
  a eSPL instead of a bSPL (for terminology see draft-andersson-mpls-
  spl-terminology)?
- will the label serving as as IOAM Indicator always be a the bottom
  of the stack and have the s-bit set?
- allocating SPL's is a decision that I would want the MPLS working
  group to take, this could be done in one of two ways, either we
  progress in the mpls wg or you split out the IANA allocation in a
  separate document and progress that in the mpls wg.

/Loa

On 2019-05-22 06:49, Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi) wrote:

Hi WG,

We have published an update to the following draft:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/

/draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/ defines how IOAM data fields are 
transported with SR-MPLS encapsulation. The draft has been updated as 
following://


 1. Add different methods of IOAM Indicator Label in Section 4.1.
 2. Add Hashing function in Section 4.2.
 3. Add Node capability in Section 4.3.
 4. Cleanup/editorial changes

Welcome your review comments and suggestions.

Thanks,

Rakesh (on behalf of co-authors and contributors)


___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring



--


Loa Anderssonemail: l...@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64

___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring


[spring] Updates to draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls

2019-05-21 Thread Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
Hi WG,

We have published an update to the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls/
draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls defines how IOAM data fields are transported 
with SR-MPLS encapsulation. The draft has been updated as following:

  1.  Add different methods of IOAM Indicator Label in Section 4.1.
  2.  Add Hashing function in Section 4.2.
  3.  Add Node capability in Section 4.3.
  4.  Cleanup/editorial changes

Welcome your review comments and suggestions.

Thanks,
Rakesh (on behalf of co-authors and contributors)

___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring