Re: [spring] Section 9.1 of the draft draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy (IP/Optical)

Thanks Clarence, we are on the same page then. Cheers, Jeff On 3/2/18, 00:37, "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" wrote: Jeff, For sure. It was our intention to have this reference. It is absolutely obvious that it must be. The point of the section 9.1 and

Re: [spring] Section 9.1 of the draft draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy (IP/Optical)

ent-routing-pol...@ietf.org" <draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-pol...@ietf.org>, "draft-anand-spring-poi...@ietf.org" <draft-anand-spring-poi...@ietf.org> Cc: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org> Subject: RE: Section 9.1 of the draft draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routin

Re: [spring] Section 9.1 of the draft draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy (IP/Optical)

@ietf.org> Subject: Re: Section 9.1 of the draft draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy (IP/Optical) Hi Ketan, Thanks for responding. I’m completely with you here, drafts are complimentary, moreover, draft poi extensively uses and references policy draft. My only request is to referen

Re: [spring] Section 9.1 of the draft draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy (IP/Optical)

Jeff, For sure. It was our intention to have this reference. It is absolutely obvious that it must be. The point of the section 9.1 and especially the new SID that we defined is to provide the proper support/context for the POI draft and hence the reference is clear. Cheers, Clarence On

Re: [spring] Section 9.1 of the draft draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy (IP/Optical)

Hi Ketan, Thanks for responding. I’m completely with you here, drafts are complimentary, moreover, draft poi extensively uses and references policy draft. My only request is to reference draft poi for the use cases that are relevant, such as section 9.1. Hope this makes sense and