That’s valid – we always take into account the various conditions spelled out
in 8.15.1.2.
SL
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of fpdcdes...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 4:02 PM
To: Bob; Sprinklerforum
Subject: Re: non
Absolutely, in this case the answer is no based on 11.2.3.1.4 (4)(d).
Thank you,
Bob Knight, CET III
208-318-3057
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of fpdcdes...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:02 PM
To: Bob; Sprinklerforum
Don't forget to ask yourself if the design area needs to be increased to 3000
sqft.
Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860-535-2080 (ofc)
860-553-3553 (fax)
860-608-4559 (cell)
>
> On Jul 31, 2017 at 6:09
You can’t call it noncombustible just because it is fire rated. Noncombustible
means the material can not burn and limited-combustible has like 1/3 the fuel
load of cellulose material and a bunch of other restrictions. The interior of
the cavity it is exposed wood. The INSIDE of this fire
A picture is worth a thousand words. Thanks sprinklerfourm for allowing
attachments. They are a huge help.
Thank you,
Bob Knight, CET III
208-318-3057
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017
Thanks Bob, thats the detail!
Rocci Cetani III, CET
Senior Designer
Water-Based Fire Protections Systems Layout, Nicet Level III
Northern California Fire Protection Services Inc.
16840 Joleen Way Bldg. A
Morgan Hill, CA 93037
P-(408) 776-1580 EXT.111
F-(408) 776-1590
Steve,
Luckily this is one of the more reasonable AHJs. Yes this a 4 story
building that is type I-A and V-A construction. Thank you, always nice to
have one of the big dogs confirm my thoughts.
Rocci Cetani III, CET
Senior Designer
Water-Based Fire Protections Systems Layout,
That's what I pictured when I wrote my ramble.
SL
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 2:29 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: non combustible/limited combustible space
Rocci,
It sounds
Rocci,
It sounds like your situation looks something like this:
If this is the case then you have a situation similar to 8.15.1.2.5 and
sprinklers should be able to be omitted.
Thank you,
Bob Knight, CET III
208-318-3057
From: Sprinklerforum
Rocci:
We see this condition in SoCal a lot and while I can't speak for your AHJ's up
there (a pit full of vipers), we treat this condition as non-combustible down
here and just about everyone on the enforcer side agrees. If I'm understanding
correctly, you have a Type 5A building (please
We have a hotel we are working on and we have limited space in the corridors
(surprise surprise) so I am trying to not sprinkle the concealed space in
the corridor. Situation is a concrete deck with min. ½ plywood sheathing
below it followed by 2x8 wood joists with (2) layers of 5/8 type X
I think if you look in the Yellow Manual (no longer yellow) you will find
galvanized is not allowed before the backflip preventer.
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:46 AM Dewayne Martinez <
dmarti...@total-mechanical.com> wrote:
> Wisconsin requires when using steel pipe on the potable water side of the
Wisconsin requires when using steel pipe on the potable water side of the
backflow preventer that it be ASTM A53 galvanized. Does ASTM A53 only come
in Sch 40?
Thanks,
Dewayne
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
