Couldn’t the construction type be interpreted as “panel” or “beam and girder”?
Rooms less than 300 sqft with full height walls should facilitate heat
collection better than exposed beams. If the construction is called panel then
the deflector could be at 18” and eliminate the sprinklers above th
Couldn’t the construction type be interpreted as “panel” or “beam and girder”?
Rooms less than 300 sqft with full height walls should facilitate heat
collection better than exposed beams. If the construction is called panel then
the deflector could be at 18” and eliminate the sprinklers above th
I have seen it go both ways. It depends on the AHJ. I have had the “sprinkler
scientist” type tell me that it isn’t above a small room so no.
Ron F
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Dewayne Martinez
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 10:09 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject
I have run into this storage arrangement a couple times. The best solution, at
least for the last project was to perforate the bin boxes with holes large
enough to drain the water but soo small for the storage to pass through. Pretty
simple solution depending the application.
Ron F
Sent from M
Counter intuitive it is. Once we did a core and shell mercantile that had 4/12
pitch wood roof. Did rough-in for OH2. The first tenant that signed up wanted a
ceiling changing the attic to LH. The system had to be changed out to meet LH
spacing and calc’s. Go figure.
Ron F
Sent from Mail for W
