RE: Old copy of NFPA 14

2019-01-21 Thread tstone52
<mailto:tston...@comcast.net> tston...@comcast.net From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of Tom Duross Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 11:32 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Old copy of NFPA 14 Sorry, 1976 edition. 5.1 and 5.3 500@65 for class 1 (plus the 2

RE: Old copy of NFPA 14

2019-01-21 Thread Tom Duross
Sorry, 1976 edition. 5.1 and 5.3 500@65 for class 1 (plus the 250 for additional up to 2500) for 30 minutes. From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of tston...@comcast.net Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 11:28 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Old copy of NFPA 14 Tom, I

RE: Old copy of NFPA 14

2019-01-21 Thread Tom Duross
500@65 for class 1 From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of tston...@comcast.net Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 11:28 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Old copy of NFPA 14 Tom, I have no idea which edition of the building code was enforce at that time. I was curious as

RE: Old copy of NFPA 14

2019-01-21 Thread tstone52
copy of NFPA 14 ’71, ’73, ’74. ’76, ’78 & ’80. You’re looking for the adopted edition for a certain building code, right? From: Sprinklerforum mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> > On Behalf Of tston...@comcast.net <mailto:tston...@comcast.net> Sent: Mo

RE: Old copy of NFPA 14

2019-01-21 Thread Tom Duross
’71, ’73, ’74. ’76, ’78 & ’80. You’re looking for the adopted edition for a certain building code, right? From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of tston...@comcast.net Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 10:46 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: Old copy of NFPA 14 Does anyone have