Love this thread- I've faced similar situations and lost every time.
In the end I agree with Steve's question of asking why we wouldn't want to
protect these areas (proactive)
Popcorn popped- carry on
Jeff Bridges
JBFP Inc
From: Sprinklerforum
It looks like this has been discussed and documented as requiring sprinklers no
matter what the covering. But one of the posts said the “insulated metal
panel” was noncombustible, using that as a possible reason for no sprinklers.
What is it insulated with? If it is insulated with
I have to agree with Steve.NFPA-13 requires sprinklers in all areas unless
specifically allowed to be omitted. This exterior covered restaurant scenario
is common in Dallas, and sprinklers are required. The only exceptions that I
know of are those that were constructed without
Steve is spot on.
See committee statement below.
[cid:image001.png@01D2B786.0BE9D460]
Peter Schwab
VP of Purchasing and Engineering technologies
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers Inc.
222 Capitol Court
Ocoee, Fl 34761
Mobile: (407) 468-8248
Direct: (407) 877-5570
Fax: (407) 656-8026
You're trying to convince the wrong guy.
Everybody should address these arguments to people whose names are followed by
the initials CBO in their email signature or who go by the first name Chief.
SML
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of
No, that's not the point. Patio furniture, planters, newspaper machines
etc.. are not considered "storage or handling of combustibles." I think a
valid claim could be made against sprinklers in this particular situation.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Steve Leyton
8.15.7.5 is your "solid reference", unless there's a conforming exception. A
vinyl canopy is not non-combustible, but aluminum sheathing is, which
underscores the subjectivity of the issue. Do I think that this is a
hyper-critical life-safety issue? No. Is there a wave of fire incident
Only if you were STORING people eating burgers on the loading dock. You're
starting to raise questions of your credibility.
Mark at Aero
602 820-7894
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 9:06 AM
To:
Look I'm not arguing against them. If you could have produced a solid reference
or ruling that says they are required than I would have said so be it. But as
there doesn't seem to be one, and in fact, I interpret 8.15.7 to read the
opposite, than I'm not going to push sprinklers on him.
John
Hm ... so the same could be said for a loading dock, no?
If the owner is willing to sign a letter stating they absolutely will not have
any fires in this area ...
SML
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of John Irwin
Sent: Monday, April
Well said.
Mark at Aero
602 820-7894
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On
Behalf Of John Irwin
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 9:01 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Covered Restaurant Seating Area
Sure I'd like to do a couple
Sure I'd like to do a couple dozen more sprinklers for them. But I'd rather
insert come common sense in to the equation. I have a steel frame and aluminum
covered panels in a seating area that is open nearly all the way around. It's
on the water so corrosion is a factor as well. I'm not
SOP out here, brother. If the fire official thinks that a retail store might
have seasonal sidewalk merchandise displays, overhangs on mercantile buildings
get sprinklered too.
John - apart from what the standard says, don't you want to sell them sprinkler
protection for this area?
SML
What does 8.15.7.5 say?“Sprinklers SHALL be installed under exterior
protections greater than 2’ wide over areas where combustibles are stored. By
any reasonable assessment, the configuration of a restaurant seating area would
have combustibles in place (i.e. stored) as a function of its
I'm in Florida so obviously we have a LOT of covered seating in the area. Very
VERY rarely do I see sprinkler protection.
John Irwin - CET
Division Manager - Fire Sprinklers
Critical System Solutions, LLC
Licence Number: FPC16-53
Cell: 813.618.2781
Email:
A.8.15.7.5 Short-term transient storage, such as that for delivered
packages, and the presence of planters, newspaper machines, and so forth,
should not be considered for storage or handling of combustibles. *** The
presence of combustible furniture on balconies for occupant use should not
John:
I was responding earlier from home and now, seated at my incredibly cluttered
desk, have reviewed 8.15.7 (2013 ed.). As tactfully as I can say this, you're
reaching. For very hard-to-grasp fruit. I sincerely doubt you're going to
get any fire or building official to see your way to
Obviously they will have their say but in Florida, local fire authorities are
not permitted to make requirements outside of the Florida Fire Prevention Code
without actually passing an ordinance.
John Irwin - CET
Division Manager - Fire Sprinklers
Critical System Solutions, LLC
Licence Number:
I suggest you run those by your local building and fire officials.
Steve
Original message
From: John Irwin
Date: 4/17/17 6:00 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Covered Restaurant Seating Area
I would
I would disagree with this unless you can direct me to some more information.
8.15.7.3(2) even goes on to spell out Light and Ordinary Hazard Occupancy
situations where sprinklers can be omitted.
John Irwin - CET
Division Manager - Fire Sprinklers
Critical System Solutions, LLC
Licence Number:
Overhang exceptions only apply when the area below is not used for storage or
handling of combustibles or otherwise classified as occupied by the applicable
building code or building official. As Spicey would say, restaurant seating
areas are assembly occupancy, PERIOD!
Steve
I'm using 13 8.15.7 to argue that if the fabric covering the steel frame is
non-combustible than perhaps the sprinklers are not required.
[cid:image005.jpg@01D2B756.F88F0A40]
John Irwin - CET
Division Manager - Fire Sprinklers
Critical System Solutions, LLC
Licence Number: FPC16-53
Cell:
Often, we try to read the standards backwards. The way that NFPA 13 is written,
it requires sprinklers everywhere. What the client is hopeful of is an
exception but I'm pretty sure they are not going to find one for this
particular application. If I'm taking the contrary point of view, I would
My interpretation and most of the AHJ we deal with look at an exterior awning
or seating area over 4' requires protection if it attached directly to the
structure. If it is only attached to the exterior or separated then it can be
lumped into the Porte Cocher exception.
-Original
Douglas,
The problem appears to be when the two small orifices in the ¾” port are
plugged and water doesn’t flow through the trim to the pressure switch. Check
carefully in systems more than five years old and where corrosion in the dry
pipe system is more evident. You will need to remove the
We have used them and haven’t run into any problems.
*From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:
sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] *On Behalf Of *Ben Young
*Sent:* Monday, April 17, 2017 5:50 AM
*To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
*Subject:* Sensing line fittings
Is there any
Yes. The covered seating area begins at the face of the structure.
John Irwin - CET
Division Manager - Fire Sprinklers
Critical System Solutions, LLC
Licence Number: FPC16-53
Cell: 813.618.2781
Email: jir...@criticalsystemsolutions.com
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum
Did the steel frame for the seating area tie in to the building structure?
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid
On Apr 17, 2017 7:11 AM, John Irwin wrote:
Here’s the situation. Existing restaurant seating area covered by steel frame
and vinyl or nylon tarp. 100%
Here's the situation. Existing restaurant seating area covered by steel frame
and vinyl or nylon tarp. 100% open. Protected with sprinklers.
Additional covered seating area being added that will be steel frame but
insulated aluminum panel roof. 100% open.
Client doesn't believe sprinklers are
Is there any reason I couldn't use ProPress (PressFit) fittings on hard
copper tube for fire pump sensing lines?
They are listed and approved for fire protection use by 13, and are
pressure rated for 175 PSI, so as long as my pump doesn't exceed that at
churn it should be OK based on my reading
30 matches
Mail list logo