I haven’t seen this. Are people putting a cage on the head?
Best.
Bruce Verhei
> On 10/15/2020 2:02 PM John Irwin via Sprinklerforum
> wrote:
>
>
> I have done a lot of these in many jurisdictions and never protected the
> lockers. I have not been asked about it yet.
>
> I do protect
To expand on Mark’s comment, I tend to think start at the dust safety first,
then sprinklers. I wasn’t bidding jobs, but I certainly saw some expensive
solutions going the other way.
Best.
Bruce Verhei
> On 10/15/2020 5:54 PM Mark.Phelps via Sprinklerforum
> wrote:
>
>
> What Craig said,
What Craig said, and don't forget about the organic dust explosion hazard.
Mark at Aero
602 820-7894
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 2:52 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Prahl,
You're gonna have to provide a WHOLE Lot more info than that. There are
numerous processes, different types of seeds, different types of
cleaning/hulling processes etc., etc., etc., etc
There is no one size fits all sprinkler density answer.
Craig Prahl | Jacobs |
Has anyone designed a sprinkler system for a seed cleaning plant? If so,
what was the design criteria that you used?
Thanks,
Tony
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
The issue we had was that the original prints did not show the half-high
lockers. By the time the 4x4 [previously] full height lockers were split in
half, the system was installed OH2. There was no way to get it up to EH2, so
the excessive shielding had to be addressed with sprinklers.
I do
That design seems excessive. Based on all of the arrangements I've looked
at, it's generally Extra Hazard (Group 2) due to the unknown commodities
and extensive shielding. No sprinklers in the lockers as it is not an
accessible space. Just the sprinklers at the ceiling level designed to
discharge
I already have a public input form ready for the 2025 cycle!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Mark.Phelps via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 1:52 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Mark.Phelps
Subject: RE: Self-storage Lockers
Maybe you should have suggested to the ahj that it needed a total flooding
inert gas system with optical detection as the primary protection system with a
6% AR /AFFF deluge system for redundancy. You just never know when someone
might leave a box of Bic pens in their locker (Flammable liquid
We just recently had this come up - had to put a head in each one. We drilled a
hole from hallway to hallway and stabbed groove weld pipe through there. Then
send in your skinniest squirrel to set the coupling, hanger, head, and guard.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Sprinklerforum On
I have done a lot of these in many jurisdictions and never protected the
lockers. I have not been asked about it yet.
I do protect the 4x4 or 5x5 lockers that are full height.
John Irwin
Quick Response Fire Protection
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low
We have always installed in each of these storage lockers, we are seeing more
and more of the stacked lockers
Thank You
James Crawford
Phaser Fire Protection Ltd.
Phone 604-888-0318
Cel: 604-790-0938
Email jcrawf...@phaserfire.ca
Web: www.phaserfire.ca
-Original Message-
From:
I'm looking at a project that is your typical self-storage building but with a
feature I haven't dealt with before. There are some lockers that are 4' x 4' x
4' cubes stacked on top of each other. Just two high, so there is 128 cubic
feet of storage space in a 16 square foot area. It's not
13 matches
Mail list logo
