: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 3:40 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: QA/QC Pipe Joining Procedures for DOE
Should of known. More persnickety than NavFac. You
Does anyone have a Quality Control/Assurance program (paper work) that has been
accepted by DOE? The stuff we have used for COE, GSA and NAVFAC projects has
been rejected.
Thanks in advance,
Ron Fletcher
Aero Phoenix
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Spelling issues? Grammar? If acceptable to NavFac (persnickety bastards at
best) what else could be objectionable besides your erudition to the
department of Education? [?]
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 AM, rfletc...@aerofire.com wrote:
Does anyone have a Quality Control/Assurance program (paper
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: QA/QC Pipe Joining Procedures for DOE
Spelling issues? Grammar? If acceptable to NavFac (persnickety bastards at
best) what else could be objectionable besides your erudition to the department
of Education? [?]
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 AM
and grammar.
Ron Fletcher
Aero Phoneix
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 10:37 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: QA/QC Pipe
@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: QA/QC Pipe Joining Procedures for DOE
Spelling issues? Grammar? If acceptable to NavFac (persnickety
bastards at
best) what else could be objectionable besides your erudition to the
department of Education? [?]
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 AM, rfletc...@aerofire.com
