RE: Building fails pressure test

2008-10-31 Thread Mark Hasenmyer
The Class III is for occupant use; therefore adequate pressure must be present at all times. The Class I is for FD use and they bring the pressure with them (fire truck). Therefore with Class I it doesn't matter if the water supply can meet the demand; it becomes a manual standpipe. Mark

RE: Building fails pressure test

2008-10-31 Thread Steve Leyton
. Steve Leyton Protection Design Consulting From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mark Hasenmyer Sent: Fri 10/31/2008 6:39 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Building fails pressure test The Class III is for occupant use; therefore adequate

RE: Building fails pressure test

2008-10-31 Thread Ed Kramer
It likely your simplest least expensive solution is to convert the class III standpipe to a class I. As someone else previously stated, the conversion is a matter of simply removing the 1 1/2 hose stations. Barring a local code requirement, there is no need for the standpipe to be 'dry'. A

Re: Building fails pressure test

2008-10-30 Thread Cherokeefirepro
Changing to clas 1 will be less expensive than installing a pump. You should contact a professional sprinkler company which you can find at www.sprinklernet.org. And www.nfsa.org. Remember, a working system is important for life and safety which is why the fire marshal is requiring this.

Re: Building fails pressure test

2008-10-30 Thread Justin Reid
If there are hoses provided for the Class III system, they may just let you remove them. Then from the description I read, it sounds like you would have to add a fire department connection. This would then give you a (manual) Class I system (removing the hoses removes the automatic water