RE: Partially sprinklered buildings

m-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org>] On Behalf Of Pete Schwab Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 1:07 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> Subject: RE: Partially sprinklered buildings

RE: Partially sprinklered buildings

] *On Behalf Of *Pete Schwab *Sent:* Tuesday, November 28, 2017 1:07 PM *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org *Subject:* RE: Partially sprinklered buildings John I am assuming this is in Florida? If so, Florida Statute 553.895 will require this building to be sprinklered because

Re: Partially sprinklered buildings

But according to George Church, if you're not a member and benefiting from AFSA services, like this forum and Sprinkler Age, you ought to become a member and benefit from all the services AFSA has to offer. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Roland Huggins wrote: >

Re: Partially sprinklered buildings

According to the IBC, it is possible to have a standard occupied building partially protected. It requires the construction to be separated mixed occupancies AND depends on the occupancies within the building. Some occupancies, like residential, require the BUILDING to be protected. Others,

RE: Partially sprinklered buildings

Thanks Pete. Thought I found what I needed in [F] 903.2.1 but I'll pull up that statute too. John Irwin DynaFire Inc. Tampa Fire Sprinkler Division 727-282-9243 This email was sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity, typographical errors, and grammatical gaffes. On Nov 28, 2017 1:07

RE: Partially sprinklered buildings

John I am assuming this is in Florida? If so, Florida Statute 553.895 will require this building to be sprinklered because it is NOT a stand alone garage. Pete Peter Schwab VP of Purchasing and Engineering technologies Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers Inc. 222 Capitol Court Ocoee, Fl 34761