g...@rowesprinkler.com
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J. Willis
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 2:08 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: wax coated - quick response
Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of George Church
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 5:14 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: wax coated - quick response sprinkler
Some of the Teflon white coatings
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matt Grise
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 4:38 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: wax coated - quick response sprinkler
You could always go with a $tainless $teel sprinkler head.
Matt Grisé PE*, LEED AP, NICET II
Sales Engineer
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:07 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: wax coated - quick response sprinkler
Check with the Manf. One I used offered poly coated as standard. The problem
you are going to run into is the esch. They are not coated, and are listed
only
Pete,
I believe the wax coating negates the QR rating
Regards,
G. Tim Stone
G. Tim Stone Consulting, LLC
NICET Level III Engineering Technician
Fire Protection Sprinkler Design
and Consulting Services
117 Old Stage Rd. - Essex Jct., VT. 05452
CELL: (802) 373-0638 TEL: (802)
Check with the Manf. One I used offered poly coated as standard. The problem
you are going to run into is the esch. They are not coated, and are listed
only with their respective manf. (semi-recessed of course).
R/
Matt
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
