: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org
sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Sent: Sat May 11 17:49:38 2013
Subject: Re: Response times to system deficiencies
I've had to follow 25 when replacing
I've had to follow 25 when replacing at diesel pump. Royal PIA even for a Spkr
geek.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 7, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Roland Huggins rhugg...@firesprinkler.org
wrote:
Obviously there's nothing in 13 since that's an installation standard. The
main point is that there is no
Obviously there's nothing in 13 since that's an installation standard. The
main point is that there is no definitive timeline in NFPA 25. You may want t
look at the ROP and ROC since this issue was proposed and rejected by the TC.
There is a NITMAM on it but the likelihood of it being added
] On Behalf Of Morey, Mike
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 2:39 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Response times to system deficiencies
I swear this was written down somewhere but I can't seem to find it at the
moment. I'm looking for NFPA 13/25/72 and/or IFC guidelines that address how
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Roland
Huggins
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 11:58 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Response times to system deficiencies
I swear this was written down somewhere but I can't seem to find it at the
moment. I'm looking for NFPA 13/25/72 and/or IFC guidelines that address how
long one has to address a deficiency based on it's severity. We work with a
single client, but their operations are split up into dozens of
