Thank you, Jonathan.
I’ve used SQLA’s association proxies before, I’ll take a look again.
You bring up a good point, though:
Ok, so this isn't a one-to-one relationship, but a many-to-many
> relationship.
>
That’s something I’ve been debating with myself for a while before I posted
here: the
On Friday, April 17, 2020 at 8:02:50 PM UTC-4, Jens Troeger wrote:
>
>
> Indeed, Child does have multiple parents…
>
Ok, so this isn't a one-to-one relationship, but a many-to-many
relationship.
I would opt for a 3 table structure:
Parent
Parent_2_Child
Child
The
