[sqlalchemy] Re: Attribute extension in 0.5rc1

2008-10-05 Thread Michael Bayer
That's more of a function specific to your application. SQLA's attribute events are specifically so you can squeeze in the middle of its own instrumentation. On Oct 3, 6:09 pm, Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was trying to send events to listeners when attributes changed on my > model.  It

[sqlalchemy] Re: Attribute extension in 0.5rc1

2008-10-03 Thread Brett
I was trying to send events to listeners when attributes changed on my model. It didn't really work out that well for me anyways as I wanted to listen to specific instances and not every instance of a mapped class. On Oct 1, 2:15 pm, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 1, 2008, at

[sqlalchemy] Re: Attribute extension in 0.5rc1

2008-10-01 Thread Michael Bayer
On Oct 1, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Brett wrote: > > I'm using AttributeExtension for my project and it would greatly > simplify things if I could receive the events after the attributes are > set. Is there any way this will make it into SqlAlchemy? having the events received before is a strong featur

[sqlalchemy] Re: Attribute extension in 0.5rc1

2008-10-01 Thread Brett
I'm using AttributeExtension for my project and it would greatly simplify things if I could receive the events after the attributes are set. Is there any way this will make it into SqlAlchemy? On Sep 28, 8:09 pm, Mike Bernson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Bayer wrote: > > > On Sep 28, 200

[sqlalchemy] Re: Attribute extension in 0.5rc1

2008-09-28 Thread Mike Bernson
Michael Bayer wrote: > > On Sep 28, 2008, at 8:23 PM, Mike Bernson wrote: > >> The set method has changed from 0.5b3 to 0.5rc1. >> >> The old set method set the value before it called the set method >> in attribute extension. The new method set the value after the >> set method is called. >> >

[sqlalchemy] Re: Attribute extension in 0.5rc1

2008-09-28 Thread Michael Bayer
On Sep 28, 2008, at 8:23 PM, Mike Bernson wrote: > > The set method has changed from 0.5b3 to 0.5rc1. > > The old set method set the value before it called the set method > in attribute extension. The new method set the value after the > set method is called. > > This is cause me problems becaus