Re: [sqlalchemy] Using Alembic to maintain versions of SPs and other objects?

2012-10-30 Thread Mike Bayer
On Oct 30, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Don Dwiggins wrote: > It appears that, at least currently, Alembic only directly manages tables > (although I guess one could include SQL code in the upgrade/downgrade > functions to add/delete/change SPs, user defined types, functions, etc. > > Am I right in this?

[sqlalchemy] Using Alembic to maintain versions of SPs and other objects?

2012-10-30 Thread Don Dwiggins
It appears that, at least currently, Alembic only directly manages tables (although I guess one could include SQL code in the upgrade/downgrade functions to add/delete/change SPs, user defined types, functions, etc. Am I right in this? If so, do you have any plans or thoughts about versionin