--On 25. April 2007 07:13:19 -0400 Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
well i just noticed youre sticking an external table into your
primaryjoinbut i see nothing there that implies the usage of a
LEFT OUTER JOIN ? are you saying that you dont need the rows from
AMH_View to be
On Apr 25, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Daniel Holth wrote:
P.S. My application uses reflection. For MySQL it would make so much
sense to combine table exists with show me the table, since they
are the same request. We should cache the result.
consider that table exists might be used for other
mssql:// supports pyodbc.
On Apr 26, 2007, at 5:35 AM, durumdara wrote:
Hi!
I want to subst. my modpy webframework to Pylons.
I want use ORM in DB handling.
But we used DBISAM in our projects, and now we access tables via ODBC
and pyodbc.
I don't see any odbc database engine in
I resolved this issue. Choosing a different mapper class as first arg
of the relation() call solved this issue and everything is working
perfectly.
-aj
--On 26. April 2007 08:44:22 +0200 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 25. April 2007 07:13:19 -0400 Michael Bayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 26, 2007, at 2:44 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 25. April 2007 07:13:19 -0400 Michael Bayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well i just noticed youre sticking an external table into your
primaryjoinbut i see nothing there that implies the usage of a
LEFT OUTER JOIN ? are you
On 4/26/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 26, 2007, at 4:40 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
- you have an aggregate function there. wheres the GROUP
BY ? not
just of the main table's columns but any other columns named for
eager loads.
It's unneeded in my
On Apr 26, 2007, at 4:40 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
- the biggest picture not here - its read only !
It's obviously meant to be that way... So I don't see a problem here.
We might want to add an exception when people try to change it, but
that shouldn't be too hard. Besides, I
Hi!
2007/4/26, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mssql:// supports pyodbc.
And how to I open the engine? (XXX is the name of the ODBC DataSource what I
want to open. It is DBISAM database).
from sqlalchemy import *
import pyodbc
db = create_engine('mssql://zeusweb', module=pyodbc)
The
On Apr 26, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
But nevermind the patch I did. I realize now it's pretty much useless.
But what about the approach I discussed in my previous mail? (using
what is in the relation loaders but without creating the instances)
well as ive said, id like it
On Apr 26, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Durumdara wrote:
Hi!
2007/4/26, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mssql:// supports pyodbc.
And how to I open the engine? (XXX is the name of the ODBC
DataSource what I want to open. It is DBISAM database).
from sqlalchemy import *
import pyodbc
db =
In our application's Order table, we have foreign-key fields which reference
the persons who placed the order, are responsible for fulfilling the order,
etc. For reporting speed, the Order table holds denormalized copies of contact
information for these people. Whenever one of the foreign keys
The stack before is all my classes, so the last one before is the call to
class_mapper in the code I send. I had a brief look at the code:
def clear_mapper(m):
del mapper_registry[m.class_key]
attribute_manager.reset_class_managed(m.class_)
if hasattr(m.class_, 'c'):
On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Kevin Schmidt wrote:
The traceback comme form del m.class_.c. It looks to me as it
tries to delete
the columns from the class and fails. I didn't define a mapper
without an
entity_name, could that be the problem?
i dont really know. id rather just remove
On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Barry Hart wrote:
In our application's Order table, we have foreign-key fields which
reference the persons who placed the order, are responsible for
fulfilling the order, etc. For reporting speed, the Order table
holds denormalized copies of contact
I can use clear_mappers() because I use mod_python and my mappers
are defined
during init. Is there any other way I can get this select mapped to
my object?
non_primary=True (see the docs on mutliple mappers for a class)
But that would mean I would define a new non_primary mapper
Hi,
we have all that. all create_engines accept a module argument, and
ms-sql specifically adds a module_name argument i believe.
engine_name seems to have got lost at some point. I'm about to go away
for a few days; I'll do a patch on my return.
BTW, Rick, when you get a chance can you
While using 0.3.5, I created a ClauseVisitor to see if a particular
table was included in a query that I dynamically build.
I've been trying to upgrade to 0.3.6 (or trunk), but that particular
section is not working the same way. The docs say that by default,
all the visit methods are still
On Apr 26, 2007, at 12:52 PM, Paul Johnston wrote:
Hi,
we have all that. all create_engines accept a module argument, and
ms-sql specifically adds a module_name argument i believe.
engine_name seems to have got lost at some point. I'm about to go away
for a few days; I'll do a patch
I've got a meeting coming up with a small team from a commercial DB
vendor that's interested in extending their support into the Python
community (yea!). Unfortunately, their analysis up until this
point has left them with the impression that supporting the django
ORM is the first priority,
.3.6 was stable (at least for me).
One of the issues to address is going to be the multi-DBAPI support. Keeping
all three stable at the same time can be tough. So starting .3.7, making
pyodbc the only supported configuration is OK with me, although I'll keep
pymssql up and running for the next
On Apr 26, 2007, at 6:15 PM, Rick Morrison wrote:
.3.6 was stable (at least for me).
One of the issues to address is going to be the multi-DBAPI
support. Keeping all three stable at the same time can be tough. So
starting .3.7, making pyodbc the only supported configuration is OK
Sounds like a great idea -- is there an existing buildbot master to tie
into, or will the whole thing be new?
On 4/26/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 26, 2007, at 6:15 PM, Rick Morrison wrote:
.3.6 was stable (at least for me).
One of the issues to address is going
22 matches
Mail list logo
