On May 10, 2006, at 2:17 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
But I'm also concerned that it requires the structures contain a
lot more functionality, because they have to be able to portably
express fairly high-level ideas. Off the top of my head, the
difference between a database that uses sequences an
Michael Bayer wrote:
On May 10, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
I've actually been wondering if a further division would be better.
Instead of defining objects with particular functionality, focus on
simpler protocols (aka magic methods), separately providing
implementations of that.
On May 10, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Ian Bicking wrote:
I've actually been wondering if a further division would be better.
Instead of defining objects with particular functionality, focus on
simpler protocols (aka magic methods), separately providing
implementations of that. The model that SQLAl
Clark C. Evans wrote:
A few months past, Ian Bicking (of SQLObject fame) presented an idea for
a SQL-API which would overlap significantly with SQLAlchemy. The goal is
to represent SQL as Python objects and provide other helpful features
(such as information schema introspection) which are not pa
4 matches
Mail list logo
