Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] nested join broken

2006-02-24 Thread Michael Bayer
weird, my test case still works if I remove the 0.1.2 fix (but tracing out i get the 994 calls again) On Feb 24, 2006, at 12:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes I'm pretty sure. Upgraded sqlalchemy and suddenly it was unbroken. Quoting Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: nothing has cha

Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] nested join broken

2006-02-24 Thread sqlalchemy
Yes I'm pretty sure. Upgraded sqlalchemy and suddenly it was unbroken. Quoting Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > nothing has changed since 0.1.1 except for a recursive bug ? are you > sure that youre observing different behavior between 0.1.1 and 0.1.2 ? > > On Feb 24, 2006, at 9:51 AM, [EMAIL

Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] nested join broken

2006-02-24 Thread Michael Bayer
nothing has changed since 0.1.1 except for a recursive bug ? are you sure that youre observing different behavior between 0.1.1 and 0.1.2 ? i suspect we havent seen the last of this weird "_impl" issue. i have plans to rework that whole relationship anyway. On Feb 24, 2006, at 9:51 AM, [E

Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] nested join broken

2006-02-24 Thread sqlalchemy
> AttributeError: 'ColumnImpl' object has no attribute 'references' Ah, this seems to be resolved for both inheritance and nested joins in 0.1.2, sorry. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extend

[Sqlalchemy-users] nested join broken

2006-02-24 Thread sqlalchemy
Hi, I find that nested joins are broken as in: join(join(foo, bar), blubber) Where bar references foo and blubber references bar. I get the error: AttributeError: 'ColumnImpl' object has no attribute 'references' Kind Regards, Florian --- Thi