Re: [sqlite] Is version 3 seriously broken?

Jakub, the "official" sqlite version isn't broken, it's the WinCE port that is. I decided to announce that in the SQLite-WinCE page so people wouldn't expect it to just work. There are other issues with the WinCE port (like the Unicode handling, and that is also in the official version), but this

Re[2]: [sqlite] trying to compile SQLite

Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 1:03:38 PM, Doug Currie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: DC> This is the SQLite 2 API... are you intending to use SQLite 2 or 3? I download everything in early summer, and probably have 2.8. I hadn't noticed 3 was out. Guess I should upgrade Best regards, Jonathan

Re[2]: [sqlite] trying to compile SQLite

CS> Oops, you've pasted the source twice, so we haven't got the errors:) Oh my. You know, that happens to me quite often, on both my Windows boxes. I hit ctrl-C, and it's like it doesn't register. My alt keystrokes, from alt-tab sequences, get eaten sometimes too. But let's not worry about *that*

RE: [sqlite] Locking in 3.0.5

>>So, Rob, are you go to tell us if you think the change >>is an improvement or not? It seems that with either of the new schemes, when using sqlite3_busy_timeout() one thread is going to timeout sooner or later. That being the case I prefer the new version on efficiency grounds. Being a lazy

[sqlite] [ANN] Webbo Announces QuickLite 1.5 Beta

Hello everybody, Today Webbo is releasing QuickLite 1.5 Beta, a Cocoa wrapper for SQLite, the embeddable SQL database engine. QuickLite already includes SQLite, so there's no need to download and to configure. It provides the developer with a SQL database without running a separate RDBMS

Re: [sqlite] trying to compile SQLite

Tuesday, August 31, 2004, 5:40:15 PM, Dennis Cote wrote: > I have also filed a ticket with attached patches to have the SQLite > makefiles (both sqlite 2 and 3) produce GCC compatible import libraries for > sqlite.dll in addition to the Borland and MSVC import libraries. > So now you can build

Re: [sqlite] Locking in 3.0.5

Rob Groves wrote: I have just read the archive mailing list from 16/08/2004, and it looks like this behaviour is on purpose (checkin 1879). So, Rob, are you go to tell us if you think the change is an improvement or not? -- D. Richard Hipp -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 704.948.4565

RE: [sqlite] Locking in 3.0.5

I have just read the archive mailing list from 16/08/2004, and it looks like this behaviour is on purpose (checkin 1879). My mistake, Rob. -Original Message- From: Rob Groves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 August 2004 22:17 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [sqlite] Locking in 3.0.5

[sqlite] Locking in 3.0.5

Hi, I have observed different behaviour between 3.0.3 and 3.0.5. I didn't download 3.0.4 so can't comment on that. I am using two threads and setting a busy timeout on each with sqlite3_busy_timeout(). In 3.0.3 two threads trying to update the same row(s) would both retry until the one with the

Re: [sqlite] OLE/DB provider for SQLite?

Did you noticed there are very few open source OLE/DB providers? MySQL only has one, and not maintained since 2001. It started as a commercial project and only later (L)GPL'ed. There is one open source for Inteerbase: http://sourceforge.net/projects/iboledb/ The reason for this, IMHO, is because

Re: [sqlite] OLE/DB provider for SQLite?

Steve O'Hara, dando pulos de alegria, escreveu : Nuno, You're not going to be making too many friends here with that attitude To my knowledge, all the wrappers for SQLite are free and most authors will also give you the source code too if you want it. Well, I decided to make the OLE/DB

[sqlite] trying to compile SQLite

I'm trying to compile SQLite, but, unfortunately, with very little joy. I'm running on Windows (sorry), and I'm using Bloodshed's C++ IDE, which appears to run some form of GNU's C++ compiler. Is anyone else using this particular combination? Below my signature, I've pasted in the short program

[sqlite] output from a compilation of sqlite-3.0.5.tar.g on SunOS 5.8.

Not sure if you're interested in this, but, attached is output from a compilation of sqlite-3.0.5.tar.g on SunOS 5.8. with a non-default configure. How can I utilize the included tests against the resultant executable? reid compilerOutput.doc.gz Description: compilerOutput.doc.gz

Re: [sqlite] DLL Version

Steve O'Hara wrote: I obviously noticed the changed API from 2.8.15 to 3.x.x but one change has left me a little puzzled - the sqlite_libversion call has been removed. This means that I can no longer determine the version of the DLL I'm using at runtime. sqlite3_libversion() is in version 3.0.5.

Re: [sqlite] Is version 3 seriously broken?

I didn't mention that I applied the diffs from SQLite-WinCE to version 3.0.5 with the same results. Jakub Jakub Adamek wrote: Hello, the version 3 is most probably broken. I traced down the crash problem in Windows CE, see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5438459_id=35230

[sqlite] Is version 3 seriously broken?

Hello, the version 3 is most probably broken. I traced down the crash problem in Windows CE, see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5438459_id=35230 It happens in balance_nonroot but in the declare variable section! If I change the variables in balance_nonroot to "static",