On Thursday, December 09, 2010 4:25 AM, Roger Binns wrote:
> You are indeed correct. It was added and is called by Fossil after using
> an
> authorizer. I did (twice) raise these issues with the team before release
> with no response.
It looks like our calls did not go unheeded: it seems now
2010/12/8 Dagdamor
> john darnell писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 08
> Dec 2010 02:23:53 +0600:
>
> > I cannot find a reference to "enum" in any SQLite documentation. Hmm.
> > I suppose I could write a quick little function and use it as the
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/2010 11:57 PM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
> But what I wonder is, for what purpose it can be used? On the face of it,
> it seems very useful, but then as you read through the description you find
> a whole load of statement types that return an
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Petite Abeille
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The pragma foreign_key_list appears to be deprecated in 3.7.4:
>>
>>
On 8 Dec 2010, at 8:03pm, Bogdan Ureche wrote:
> Now that foreign key constraints are enforced natively, why would you want
>
>> to have a list of them? Why should the foreign_key_list pragma continue to
>> consume code space and developer maintenance time?
>
> It would make life easier for
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 06:35:06 -0500, Richard Hipp
wrote:
>The version is still 3.7.4. It is merely encoded as 3070400 in the
>filename, since names like 3070400, 3070403, 3070420, 3070500, 3071200
>sort into correct order when you do "ls", but the corresponding real
>version
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 10:44:31 -0800, Kirk Clemons
wrote:
>I would like to select each row in order from a table without getting the
>table information as well.
>This way I can insert them into another database with the same tables.
>How would I do this?
$ sqlite3
On 8 December 2010 20:44, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Petite Abeille
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The pragma foreign_key_list appears to be deprecated in 3.7.4:
>>
>> http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_foreign_key_list
>>
That is very bad news ...
My application uses this information e.g. to automatically populate
comboboxes (FKs) etc.
Am 08.12.2010 20:35, schrieb Petite Abeille:
> Hello,
>
> The pragma foreign_key_list appears to be deprecated in 3.7.4:
>
>
On Dec 8, 2010, at 8:44 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Now that foreign key constraints are enforced natively, why would you want
> to have a list of them?
To know what they are. In the same way as there are pragma that list database,
table, column, index, etc...
To paraphrase:
"Now that tables
Now that foreign key constraints are enforced natively, why would you want
> to have a list of them? Why should the foreign_key_list pragma continue to
> consume code space and developer maintenance time?
>
>
>
It would make life easier for developers of administration tools for SQLite,
for
On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Petite Abeille >wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The pragma foreign_key_list appears to be deprecated in 3.7.4:
>>
>> http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_foreign_key_list
>>
>> Any reason
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The pragma foreign_key_list appears to be deprecated in 3.7.4:
>
> http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_foreign_key_list
>
> Any reason for such deprecation?
>
Now that foreign key constraints are
Hello,
The pragma foreign_key_list appears to be deprecated in 3.7.4:
http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_foreign_key_list
Any reason for such deprecation?
What's the alternative to that pragma to achieve the same effect?
Thanks in advance.
john darnell писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 08
Dec 2010 02:23:53 +0600:
> I cannot find a reference to "enum" in any SQLite documentation. Hmm.
> I suppose I could write a quick little function and use it as the
> Default...
Hmm, there is a useful function
I just tried it on my Mac and this new build works pretty well.
Thanks a lot for your assistance.
--
Marco Bambini
http://www.sqlabs.com
On Dec 8, 2010, at 1:54 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> In Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:22 PM,
Hi all,
After a day of debugging and code changes I realised that SQLite rocks, it
was some of my C code not getting cleaned up (basically structures returned
from the Queue where not FREE'd properly). C coding is not my day job ...;-)
So lesson learnt: Do not blame SQLite for dodgy C code that
Hello,
on the table :
CREATE TABLE HASH(
ID INTEGER PRIMARY KEY ASC,
x1_y1 INTEGER,
x1_y2 INTEGER,
x1_y3 INTEGER,
x1_y4 INTEGER,
x1_y5 INTEGER,
x2_y1 INTEGER,
x2_y2 INTEGER,
x2_y3 INTEGER,
x2_y4 INTEGER,
x2_y5 INTEGER,
x3_y1 INTEGER,
x3_y2 INTEGER,
x3_y3
Dan Kennedy wrote:
> On 12/08/2010 04:18 AM, Iker Arizmendi wrote:
>> The function that opens a cursor for the simple tokenizer,
>> simpleOpen, does not set the "pTokenizer" member of the
>> returned cursor. Ie, it appears the following line is
>> missing:
>>
>> c->base.pTokenizer =
Thank you Shane
Thanks also to Jay A. Kreibich and Simon Slavin
Happy new year
Horacio Pereira
-Mensagem Original-
From: Shane Harrelson
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:32 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite]SQLite in WinCE Emulator - Disk I/O Error
According to the MSDN support sites, there are a couple of known
issues with the Windows Mobile Emulator, when using emulated storage
cards. With an emulated storage card, SetEndOfFile() (which we use
for truncating a file) and FlushFileBuffers() (which we use for
syncing) will fail. They do not
Hi there,
I am playing with the PRAGMA cache_size and it seems to help lots. I will
keep you posted ;-)
Lynton
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Lynton Grice
Sent: 07 December 2010 10:31 PM
To:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Ladislav Bodnar wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 December 2010, Richard Hipp wrote:
>> I changed to a more consistent naming scheme for all of the build
>> products:
>>
>> sqlite-PRODUCT-OS-ARCH-VERSION.zip
>>
>> with the OS and ARCH being
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> You have to have multiple processes really hammering away at the
> database in order to get this to happen, which is apparently what you
> are doing, huh. And we've only seen this on variations of unix, not
> on windows.
On Wednesday 08 December 2010, Richard Hipp wrote:
> I changed to a more consistent naming scheme for all of the build
> products:
>
> sqlite-PRODUCT-OS-ARCH-VERSION.zip
>
> with the OS and ARCH being omitted for source-code products. In your
> case, you probably are looking for
>
>
Interesting, seems that for my queue implementation using SQLite in WAL mode
if I keep a "global" connection handle open while the client is using the
queue then the memory grows quickly..but if I open and close the handle on
each SEND, RECEIVE etc then all is fine...
Does this sound right?
Hi there,
Regarding the message I sent earlier...Just a quick update from my side, it
seems when I run the following
sqlite3_step(stmt);
The memory grows and does not get released in my specific case even though I
set
sqlite3_finalize(stmt);
after it.
The moment I comment
Hi, all
I'm using SQLite version 3.7.2 ported to Windows CE, in a application developed
using Lazarus
I got the compiled SQLITE3.DLL for Windows CE in the site www.parmaja.com
For now, I am using one emulator to run the native Windows CE application in
a desktop computer running Windows
I would like to select each row in order from a table without getting the table
information as well.
This way I can insert them into another database with the same tables.
How would I do this?
Thank you,
Kirk.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
Hi there,
I am a huge SQLite fan and am very curious as to why the following would
happen.
Essentially I have a "queue implementation" using SQLIte in WAL mode and it
is working really well.
However, at runtime if I watch the Task Manager in windows as thousands of
messages are sent to
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Yoni Londner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, in this scheme the checksum is based on salt values and own frame
> content.a
>
> Note that the current design solve a potential DB corruption bug in
> sqlite. current WAL design is base on the fact that once
Hi,
Just noticed that the format of the version in the tarball name changed,
as in "sqlite-autoconf-3070400.tar.gz". However, this unpacks to a
directory called "sqlite-3.7.4". This makes it difficult for automated
build systems that want to have a predictable directory name. Would it
be
32 matches
Mail list logo